Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Power play: Disney handicapped new Reedy Creek board before handing over control [View all]Celerity
(53,791 posts)16. Rule against perpetuities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_against_perpetuities
The rule against perpetuities is a legal rule in the common law that prevents people from using legal instruments (usually a deed or a will) to exert control over the ownership of private property for a time long beyond the lives of people living at the time the instrument was written. Specifically, the rule forbids a person from creating future interests (traditionally contingent remainders and executory interests) in property that would vest beyond 21 years after the lifetimes of those living at the time of creation of the interest, often expressed as a "life in being plus twenty-one years". In essence, the rule prevents a person from putting qualifications and criteria in a deed or a will that would continue to affect the ownership of property long after he or she has died, a concept often referred to as control by the "dead hand" or "mortmain".
The basic elements of the rule against perpetuities originated in England in the 17th century and were "crystallised" into a single rule in the 19th century. The rule's classic formulation was given in 1886 by the American legal scholar John Chipman Gray:
The rule against perpetuities is a legal rule in the common law that prevents people from using legal instruments (usually a deed or a will) to exert control over the ownership of private property for a time long beyond the lives of people living at the time the instrument was written. Specifically, the rule forbids a person from creating future interests (traditionally contingent remainders and executory interests) in property that would vest beyond 21 years after the lifetimes of those living at the time of creation of the interest, often expressed as a "life in being plus twenty-one years". In essence, the rule prevents a person from putting qualifications and criteria in a deed or a will that would continue to affect the ownership of property long after he or she has died, a concept often referred to as control by the "dead hand" or "mortmain".
The basic elements of the rule against perpetuities originated in England in the 17th century and were "crystallised" into a single rule in the 19th century. The rule's classic formulation was given in 1886 by the American legal scholar John Chipman Gray:
No interest is good unless it must vest, if at all, not later than twenty-one years after some life in being at the creation of the interest.
John Chipman Gray, Rule Against Perpetuities § 201.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Power play: Disney handicapped new Reedy Creek board before handing over control [View all]
In It to Win It
Mar 2023
OP
Does this mean Disney gets a billion dollars and no longer has to maintain their roads?
TheBlackAdder
Mar 2023
#2
I think it means DeSantis never looked at the board, its prior agreements, or what
Johonny
Mar 2023
#7
Let's not forget this will be their second trip to the drawing board to prop up Desantis
Hassin Bin Sober
Mar 2023
#40
Right... but they had to be having some fun by choosing that particular living person, right?
BlueCheeseAgain
Mar 2023
#19
Because it is grounded in English common law, the British monarch at the time of writing is often
Celerity
Mar 2023
#20
Law school teachers will often inject nonsensical stuff like that. Why? Merely to see....
machoneman
Mar 2023
#31
Interesting. I find it abhorrent when businesses attempt to manipulate government.
OldBaldy1701E
Mar 2023
#24
We just might find out there's more to that agreement when they cross that bridge LOL
In It to Win It
Mar 2023
#21
Disney just completely stripped the power from Ron DeSantis' handpicked board
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2023
#43