Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ford_Prefect

(8,503 posts)
16. I wonder are we back to "He said, She said"?
Wed Mar 29, 2023, 11:13 PM
Mar 2023

I've seen the USG cover up many things since agent orange and also just plain get them wrong out of no ill intent. I can't speak for all of the cases but the descriptions of the initial ones didn't seem to flag with organic causes of one kind or another. I have seen what radio waves can do when applied with the appropriate focus.

I doubt this was an intentional effect. I also see the possibility that someone has something to hide. The conflicting reports make it difficult to be sure. The government has been vague and doubtful that there was actual damage initially which begs the question of whether they were telling us the whole truth 3 weeks ago.

Seven different U.S. intelligence agencies were involved in the investigation, and five found it was "highly unlikely" a foreign country was to blame. One said it was "unlikely," and one didn't take a position.

The officials also said there was "no credible evidence" that a foreign adversary has a weapon capable of inflicting the kind of harm suffered by the U.S. officials


That is not the same thing as a device effect which originates in something which is NOT a weapon, like a listening device using microwaves as the medium.

It will be interesting to see how this turns out, if indeed we'll ever get a finite answer.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Declassified report sugge...»Reply #16