General Discussion

live love laugh

(16,482 posts)

23. WHAT?! " ... intent would be to appease the democratic masses..."

Reply to newdayneeded (Original post)

Tue Apr 4, 2023, 12:35 AM

Apr 2023

You believe the grand jury and legal system are in place for appeasement?

Mon Apr 3, 2023, 09:46 PM
newdayneeded

0. Tell me if this is plausible:

This indictment was allowed to go through because it was the weakest of the bunch. The intent would be to appease the democratic masses with an issuing of an indictment. An indictment that could maybe end up with zero prison time but heavy fines, and maybe public service speaking, something like that. (not at all what I want for the dickhead)

The DOJ could say, hey we got trump in on an indictment, but the other cases will take much longer to sort out. like I said, a sort of appeasement. Hoping DU does cartwheels over a 5 million dollar fine but no jail time.

Whether you think this is right or wrong, I just want to know if this is plausible in your eyes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tell me if this is plausible: [View all] newdayneeded Apr 2023 OP

No NoRethugFriends Apr 2023 #1

No elleng Apr 2023 #2

I don't think so. Jack Smith is not playing. MLAA Apr 2023 #3

New disclosure of videos to show the OrangeAsshole going through the classified files, 3Hotdogs Apr 2023 #22

No. How would that even work? Phoenix61 Apr 2023 #4

It is not at all plausible. The various indictments are produced by grand juries, Ocelot II Apr 2023 #5

Could be you are correct. republianmushroom Apr 2023 #6

No, it couldn't possibly be correct. Ocelot II Apr 2023 #9

We shall see, time will tell if the poster is correct. republianmushroom Apr 2023 #10

I don't have to wait. The OP clearly doesn't know how the process works Ocelot II Apr 2023 #11

my first thought is the charges are weak, but now i don't think he would risk weak charges Groundhawg Apr 2023 #7

Maybe. I'll celebrate when orthoclad Apr 2023 #8

The Supreme Court has already ruled against Trump multiple times. emulatorloo Apr 2023 #15

No. We're fact-based here. Jack Smith has multiple grand juries hard at work, and he has just emulatorloo Apr 2023 #12

In your dreams. Trump is going to prison for sedition. flying_wahini Apr 2023 #13

He will not be charged with sedition. former9thward Apr 2023 #17

He probably won't go to prison at all, even if he is convicted Ocelot II Apr 2023 #19

whoa, not my dreams. newdayneeded Apr 2023 #21

No. Nt obnoxiousdrunk Apr 2023 #14

I agree this case is small beer when compared to GA or DOJ. Sneederbunk Apr 2023 #16

Are you unaware that Pence was recently compelled by the courts to testify about J6? emulatorloo Apr 2023 #18

Pence was just ordered to testify before the 1/6 grand jury. Ocelot II Apr 2023 #20

WHAT?! " ... intent would be to appease the democratic masses..." live love laugh Apr 2023 #23

I mean, from everything I've seen reported... SKKY Apr 2023 #24

Thanks for the responses. newdayneeded Apr 2023 #25

See: " Federal appeals court denies Trump's emergency bid to stop ex-aides from testifying in Jan. 6 emulatorloo Apr 2023 #26