Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Make No Mistake Marianne Williamson Is Moving Forward [View all]Hekate
(100,133 posts)185. Parse my statement more closely: she has warm fuzzies. He does not. Both are unqualified.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
210 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So am I. She is not our friend. She has zero government experience, not so much as city council.
Hekate
Apr 2023
#13
Because a crackpot with 1 or 2% of the vote can swing the election to the R's. nt
pnwmom
Apr 2023
#116
Which is why I have absolutely no patience for them any more, from Nader to Jill Stein to Marianne
Hekate
Apr 2023
#146
Except Marianne Williamson is a Democrat who intends to run in a Democratic primary.
redgreenandblue
Apr 2023
#153
She is running against a Democratic incumbent president in a crucial year...which makes her
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#164
Anybody can register as anything they want. I doubt the woo lady has a single clue...
Hekate
Apr 2023
#174
Is she behind the No Labels campaign that promises transparency but is darker than a moonless night?
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2023
#2
One way of looking at it. Sort of like Branson slashing 85% of his Virgin shuttle.
LiberalFighter
Apr 2023
#27
She's moving up in the polls, too - She busted through double digit ceiling, Baby!
Brother Buzz
Apr 2023
#10
Is the 15% polling threshold for candidates to qualify for debates still in effect?
Brother Buzz
Apr 2023
#96
Very true Brother...I think she goes nowhere...the GOP needs a spoiler to run against
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#97
I question whether she even has the wherewithal to qualify for 50 primary races
Brother Buzz
Apr 2023
#105
I think you are correct...she will likely be humiliated in the primaries despite all the breathless
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#165
There is no criteria. Biden has no real challengers. He won't debate vanity candidates.
tritsofme
Apr 2023
#156
This woman has no interest whatsoever in the candidacy of a loon like Williamson.
Ocelot II
Apr 2023
#19
Marianne is successful in one arena only -- kinda like Donald Trump, only with warm fuzzies...
Hekate
Apr 2023
#20
All those independent parties would do is split the vote and elect the GOP types which is
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#89
You can edit your OP to add a link to your source, & indicate what is you & what is the author...
Hekate
Apr 2023
#39
MARIANNE WILLIAMSON is smart enough to be a president and she is smart enough to choose a cabinet
Merrill
Apr 2023
#18
No, she isn't. She's a self-promoting goofball with no government experience.
Ocelot II
Apr 2023
#21
She is trying to cost us the election. And she has no experience and not enough smarts IMHO
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#93
To reiterate: She has zero government experience, like Trump only with warm fuzzies
Hekate
Apr 2023
#25
This lady has no chance of even getting into a debate with President Biden
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2023
#65
No, she knows that all she would do is help the GOP win...she has no chance and she should
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#90
One wonders how much you are getting paid to shill for her. Nobody in this thread has
niyad
Apr 2023
#159
No, she very clearly is a dummy. Probably more than anyone who's run for president recently
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2023
#197
She's smart enough to run for President so that she can raise political donations to pimp her books
grantcart
Apr 2023
#207
There won't be debates. There are no real challengers, just goofballs like this.
tritsofme
Apr 2023
#38
Women will not vote for her just because she is a woman, she needs to be qualified
Bev54
Apr 2023
#24
Indeed. In re: Ralph Nader's part in defeating Al Gore in 2000. Pure Green Nader took money...
Hekate
Apr 2023
#133
So, because you don't "worship" Biden, you think we do? That's not reasonable. You happy with Trump?
Hekate
Apr 2023
#53
lol, anyone who is a natural born citizen, 35, and a 14 years a resident meets the "qualifications"
tritsofme
Apr 2023
#57
I wouldn't consider voting for her unless her pandemic plan is very good n/t
liberal_mama
Apr 2023
#50
I prefer new faces as opposed to status quo politicians who often don't bring change
Merrill
Apr 2023
#52
The fact she used the made-up word "invisibilize" is disqualifying right there.
Ocelot II
Apr 2023
#54
Well fuck me, coulda sworn it was one of those made-up words where a perfectly good adjective
Ocelot II
Apr 2023
#107
Let us make this perfectly clear: you support someone who is primarying the incumbent Democrat
Hekate
Apr 2023
#77
She was moving forward in January 2019, until she stopped running a year later.
onenote
Apr 2023
#60
This lady was abusive to her staffers and it is very clear that there will be no debates
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2023
#73
Nah, there is a new poster with the handle "marianne w", says her name is judy p,
niyad
Apr 2023
#166
This is like when a huge international corporation markets a new product as all-natural organic
betsuni
Apr 2023
#78
***Marianne Williamson's rise in polls echoes Bernie Sanders meteoric 2016***
Marianne W
Apr 2023
#79
Hi Marianne! Did Merrill send you over here? I hope you read the TOS before signing on...
Hekate
Apr 2023
#81
Did AOC primary an actual Democrat incumbent? Funny I don't remember that, but I don't follow...
Hekate
Apr 2023
#101
Somehow, I think there's more to it than what you imply. More importantly, your doppleganger...
Hekate
Apr 2023
#108
Crawley was so sure he would win, he didn't even bother to show up for their debate
womanofthehills
Apr 2023
#115
You are, of course, free to believe, or not, however you choose. Do not project.
niyad
Apr 2023
#171
You still have not answered whether you are a paid staffer for "miracles" gal. I
niyad
Apr 2023
#191
Too bad that neither Iowa nor New Hampshire will pay a meaningful role in the 2020 Dem primaries
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2023
#85
I suspect this is a case of Sleeping Beauty rearranging their sock drawer before another long nap
Hekate
Apr 2023
#119
Trashing...appropriate to trash a thread about a soon to be former Democrat who runs against
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#162
Williamson will never be the nominee. She could win the most delegates and will still not
Renew Deal
Apr 2023
#179
Zero government experience, successful in only one arena. Like Trump, only with warm fuzzies...
Hekate
Apr 2023
#181