Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Nevilledog

(55,206 posts)
Thu Apr 6, 2023, 07:09 PM Apr 2023

Lithwick: Clarence Thomas Broke the Law and It Isn't Even Close [View all]

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/04/clarence-thomas-broke-the-law-harlan-crow.html

ProPublica’s scrupulously reported new piece on Justice Clarence Thomas’ decadeslong luxury travel on the dime of a single GOP megadonor will probably not shock you at all. Sure, the dollar amounts spent are astronomical, and of course the justice failed to report any of it, and of course the megadonor insists that he and Thomas are dear old friends, so of course the superyacht and the flights on the Bombardier Global 5000 jet and the resorts are all perfectly benign. So while the details are shocking, the pattern here is hardly a new one. This is a longstanding ethics loophole that has been exploited by parties with political interests in cases before the court to curry favor in exchange for astonishing junkets and perks. It is allowed to happen.

We will doubtless spend a few news cycles expressing outrage that Harlan Crow has spent millions of dollars lavishing the Thomases with lux vacations and high-end travel and barely pretended to separate business and pleasure, giving half a million dollars to a Tea Party group founded by Ginni Thomas in 2011 (which funded her own $120,000 salary). But because the justices are left to police themselves and opt not to do so, we will turn to other matters in due time. Before the outrage dries up, however, it is worth zeroing in on two aspects of the ProPublica report that do have lasting legal implications. First, the same people who benefited from the lax status quo continue to fight against any meaningful reforms that might curb the justices’ gravy train. Second, the rules governing Thomas’ conduct over these years, while terribly insufficient, actually did require him to disclose at least some of these extravagant gifts. The fact that he ignored the rules anyway illustrates just how difficult it will be to force the justices to obey the law: Without the strong threat of enforcement, a putative public servant like Thomas will thumb his nose at the law.

If there is a single image that captures this seedy state of affairs, it is a painting of Thomas hanging out with Leonard Leo (Federalist Society co-chair and judicial power broker) and Mark Paoletta (who has served as chief counsel to former Vice President Mike Pence and general counsel of Donald Trump’s Office of Management and Budget). Both are political operatives, though Crow assures us that they would never dare talk about Thomas’ work. This image should be enough to shock anyone into taking action against the spigot of dark money that flows directly from billionaire donors into the court, its justices, and their spouses’ pockets. Continuing to live as though there is nothing to be done about any of this is a choice. We make it every day.

In addition to working in the Trump-Pence administration, Paoletta serves as the Thomases’ longtime fixer, attack dog, and booster. He represented Ginni Thomas when she spoke to the Jan 6. committee about her support for overturning the 2020 election. He also edited a biography of Clarence Thomas based on an almost comically obsequious documentary (in which he was also involved). So it should not be a surprise that Paoletta has also testified against any ethics reform measures for the Supreme Court, dismissing the reform movement as part of “the coordinated campaign by some Democrats and their allies in the corporate media to smear conservative Justices with the goal of delegitimizing the court.”

*snip*


29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"...on the dime of a single GOP megadonor..." hippywife Apr 2023 #1
PROOF that the saying NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW bluestarone Apr 2023 #2
You nailed it republianmushroom Apr 2023 #12
Yep. It's a catchy expression, but not true. Unfortunately. n/t Evolve Dammit Apr 2023 #14
I think the problem is.... RussBLib Apr 2023 #19
+ 100 Duppers Apr 2023 #21
Blood boiling, again. enough Apr 2023 #3
Ditto onetexan Apr 2023 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2023 #4
Do these 'gifts' MOMFUDSKI Apr 2023 #5
We need an impeachment-capable majority in both houses. Hermit-The-Prog Apr 2023 #6
Wow. A gift of a six figure salary? A gift?! icymist Apr 2023 #7
Who would deny a friend a favor? Kid Berwyn Apr 2023 #8
K&R Solly Mack Apr 2023 #9
Dems and the Media BOSSHOG Apr 2023 #10
"Conservative" logic is truly amazing to behold Martin Eden Apr 2023 #23
Post removed Post removed Apr 2023 #11
Some day we as a nation are going to have to deal with the fact that we were founded... NullTuples Apr 2023 #15
That's a great post. I'm recommending it. BComplex Apr 2023 #25
And you just wonder what votes on what decisions were a result of these "gifts?" n/t Evolve Dammit Apr 2023 #16
Yes you don't give that kind of money without some strings attached. Irish_Dem Apr 2023 #18
Just a "dear friend" according to Clarence. Ya right... Evolve Dammit Apr 2023 #26
A SC Justice lying his ass off. Irish_Dem Apr 2023 #27
Well, he got away with it with Anita Hill, his wife is an election rigger, so for them, it works. Evolve Dammit Apr 2023 #29
The SC is a corrupt political junta. Irish_Dem Apr 2023 #17
At the very least, he needs to get socked with a huge tax bill Warpy Apr 2023 #20
Clarence Thomas may have violated financial disclosure law, ethics experts say LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2023 #22
Don't quite know how things work, BUT bluestarone Apr 2023 #24
K & R FakeNoose Apr 2023 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lithwick: Clarence Thomas...