Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(23,384 posts)
20. That's the difference between you and me.
Tue Apr 11, 2023, 10:54 AM
Apr 2023

I have always acknowledged that so much is unknown, that it is impossible, irresponsible and plain inaccurate to assert, with certainty ,that Garland/DOJ are “doing nothing”, guilty of inaction, derelict in their duty, dropping the ball, refusing to prosecute, or any number of other judgements that have been posted.

The little that we do know (which has been gradually increasing) points to the exact opposite conclusion.

You don't know, and your guess is as good as any one elses.


I admit that I don’t know, and I’m not making any guesses- I’m just confronting folks who not only make guesses, but assert, with certainty , that a negative judgement or outcome is inevitable, based on the absence of public information or visible public actions .

I’m saying you don’t know, and couldn’t possibly know, how this is going to turn out (and neither do Schiff, Kirschner, et al), and me pointing that out (repeatedly, as I am a tenacious member of the reality-based community) clearly annoys you. My goal isn’t to annoy, it is to point out that , outside of DOJ, specifically Smith’s team (formerly Garland’s team), no one could possibly know the status of the current investigation or the intentions or state of mind of the investigators .

And that’s the difference between us- you think you know, or the TV lawyers know, and I’m pointing out that none of us know.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

also cuz they cut their mics. mopinko Apr 2023 #1
That point... 2naSalit Apr 2023 #3
This needs to be reported more. pandr32 Apr 2023 #6
Same thing as Merrick Garland saying gab13by13 Apr 2023 #2
Who said members of congress were immune from prosecution? Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #5
Convenient. Chin music Apr 2023 #10
Listening to the silence with your fingers in your ears going "LALALALALALALALALALALALA" Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #11
Oh boy. Chin music Apr 2023 #12
Did they crack that phone today? Chin music Apr 2023 #17
What you claim is inaction is in reality unknown action Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #18
Uncertainty distresses me bc the J6 committee already laid out the case to hang trmp. Chin music Apr 2023 #19
That's the difference between you and me. Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #20
I'm glad there's a difference. And you rarely say you don't know. Sorry. Chin music Apr 2023 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2023 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2023 #8
John Lewis talked about "getting into good trouble". patphil Apr 2023 #4
all I ever hear and see from the right is lies, distortion and gross hyperbole LymphocyteLover Apr 2023 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2023 #9
it's governance by clicks, for the clicks and of the clicks. mopinko Apr 2023 #14
Recommended. H2O Man Apr 2023 #13
We're all being too uppity for their taste, so their perpetual high volume and acts of JudyM Apr 2023 #15
K&R for visibility. crickets Apr 2023 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alex Wagner made some rem...»Reply #20