Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It would be nice if those DUers who [View all]malaise
(297,245 posts)27. I said legitimate political system not
electoral system. I agree with you re Citizen's United but the billionaires wasted their money while enriching M$Greedia and consultants like Rove. The fact that they could not buy the elections is more proof that the political system is legitimate and sound - citizens were engaged and decided to participate despite the electoral obstacles imposed by ReTHUGs in a FEW states.
The fact that the Judicial branch of Government (local and Federal) shut down the voter suppression further demonstrates that the political system is legitimate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I went by data. Not pundits. Those who thought he'd win a landslide, that was wishful thinking
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#26
Yes. About 1.5%. I hadn't realized it had gone up that much from FL. Election night it was 1%.nt
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#44
Let's see...the President wins by at least 3 mill pop vote and more than 100 EV....
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#39
No - legitimacy is the view of citizens that the government rightfully earned its right to rule
malaise
Nov 2012
#19
I hope (against hope?) that Congress tackles this issue. The RIGHT to vote EASILY
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#31
I thought it was a slam dunk after the Dem Nat'l Convention. Then the 1st debate happened.
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#11
Only the media could push the view that one debate could decide the plethora of issues
malaise
Nov 2012
#21
I seem to recall that Romney lied and flip-flopped constantly during that first debate.....
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#40
Yes, Romney lied. But the fact is....Obama lost. Yes, Romney's a lying SOS....
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#46
You weren't watching the same MSNBC I was watching during and after the 1st debate.
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#47
Yes, I watched those screamers at MSNBC and was horrified by their bad behavior.....
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#57
No. The PEOPLE decide who won. Not fact checkers afterwards. Millions decided
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#63
The PEOPLE decide who won. If a debater lies, and the other debater doesn't call him on it...
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#66
I know you can't see this, but for the record: If you can't take facts, why are you in a forum like
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#60
Me, too. I just didn't dare dream he'd get over 300 EVs. But he didn't NEED to.
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#15
Election integrity concerns were valid, in view of the MSM narrative hyping a big Romney win.
proverbialwisdom
Nov 2012
#53
The hair on fire "we could lose" types got to me too. I was sick of their fear. nt
bluestate10
Nov 2012
#70