General Discussion

Fiendish Thingy

(24,018 posts)

82. No serious person is making that argument

Fri Apr 14, 2023, 07:10 PM

Apr 2023

All reports are that 60 votes are needed to replace Feinstein, wither temporarily or permanently, with any senator from any state.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

106 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GOP won't let Schumer replace Feinstein on Judicary unless it's with Sinema [View all] SunSeeker Apr 2023 OP

Phucking GOP AllyCat Apr 2023 #1

Oh hell no. brush Apr 2023 #2

Just name a Democrat gratuitous Apr 2023 #3

We need 60 votes. What do you suggest? SunSeeker Apr 2023 #7

No vote, just name the replacement and seat that person gratuitous Apr 2023 #38

He can't Polybius Apr 2023 #68

Let the Republicans enforce the rules if they can gratuitous Apr 2023 #69

That's not how it works Polybius Apr 2023 #70

You should tell Neal Gorsuch, then gratuitous Apr 2023 #72

Neal Gorsuch was voted on and confirmed by the Senate. NYC Liberal Apr 2023 #88

I don't have to, that's legal Polybius Apr 2023 #103

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2023 #4

Are you kidding me? montanacowboy Apr 2023 #5

Sinema is no longer a Democrat. Not going to happen. Freethinker65 Apr 2023 #6

Duh 🙄. Did anyone expect Republicans to compromise? live love laugh Apr 2023 #8

We don't even need to bring that up tirebiter Apr 2023 #9

Doesn't work that way Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #11

Not if the new senator is taking over for a resigned senator. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #16

Not according to this: Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #39

Maybe argue that the CA seat on Judicary has not been vacated, just the person holding that seat. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #75

No serious person is making that argument Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #82

Maybe they should be. nt SunSeeker Apr 2023 #91

Schumer already tried to have "several" interventions with Feinstein. Scrivener7 Apr 2023 #36

I got personally attacked by a poster here for posting the same thing Marius25 Apr 2023 #54

I was pretty viciously attacked for ageism when I said Scrivener7 Apr 2023 #58

We've all been attacked by that poster. maxsolomon Apr 2023 #67

. Scrivener7 Apr 2023 #73

This all could have been avoided if DiFi had retired 6 months ago. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #10

Yup. nt SunSeeker Apr 2023 #15

Or not run for re-election. Sky Jewels Apr 2023 #21

Yup. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #25

This is a bit of a distortion regarding that time period. Nixie Apr 2023 #35

Nothing I said was a distortion. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #78

Even saying she was too old for reelection is a distortion. Supposedly it was Nixie Apr 2023 #81

She was 84 in 2018. She shouldn't have run for another 6 year term. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #86

Kevin de Leon turned out to be a real winner bigtree Apr 2023 #46

Yes, he is another in the long history of promising young candidates who flamed out. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #80

you claimed it was 'name-recognition' bigtree Apr 2023 #84

It was name recognition. That's how Schwarzenegger became governor. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #85

I'm not usually polite with people spreading disinformation about our Democratic legislators bigtree Apr 2023 #94

I did not say anything factually incorrect about Diane Feinstein. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #95

The United States Senate is broken. nevergiveup Apr 2023 #12

Deliberately broken by the Republicans. Not by this, Hortensis Apr 2023 #102

Your title misrepresents the article grantcart Apr 2023 #13

No it doesn't. Sinema is the only person the GOP has suggested. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #14

Reread the article. The GOP Senate caucus hasn't indicated ani. grantcart Apr 2023 #18

The Senate caucus hasn't yet, but GOP Senators have, as the article notes. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #20

We're not "ignoring it"; we've read the article, and are correcting your misleading headline muriel_volestrangler Apr 2023 #23

It's not misleading. I'm citing the "evidence" the articles states. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #24

I think the issue the other posters have is that there is not the word 'possibly' added about Celerity Apr 2023 #28

Again, no-one was quoted as saying it should be Sinema muriel_volestrangler Apr 2023 #31

See my reply #39 Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #44

Not ignoring anything. The "GOP" hasn't developed a position on grantcart Apr 2023 #29

And you think the GOP who refused to confirm Merrick Garland will do anything to help Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #52

No, That is my point grantcart Apr 2023 #76

Oh please, the GOP will most certainly do everything in their power to prevent Biden Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #50

Exactly, they are not going to approve of Sinema which is what the OP is promoting. grantcart Apr 2023 #77

They are only naming Sinema to obstruct, since they know Dems won't want to appoint her. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #87

LoL there is no "they". One senator mentioned her name but made no grantcart Apr 2023 #97

It's not just "one senator." SunSeeker Apr 2023 #100

Did Feinstein not foresee this????? What is her position now? TomDaisy Apr 2023 #17

Sen Feinstein is suffering from advanced Alzheimer's and has grantcart Apr 2023 #19

that's just false. bigtree Apr 2023 #33

It's not false. It's been reported by people who interact with her Marius25 Apr 2023 #41

There has been no dianosis of Alzhiemer's ripcord Apr 2023 #45

I didn't say she was diagnosed with Alzheimers. Marius25 Apr 2023 #47

it is absolutely false. bigtree Apr 2023 #48

I'm not spreading misinformation. Marius25 Apr 2023 #49

Schumer has said nothing in that article or anywhere else about her memory bigtree Apr 2023 #53

How is it an injustice? Marius25 Apr 2023 #55

Characterizing people here who think a sick 90 year old should retire as "Feinstein's political Scrivener7 Apr 2023 #59

characterizing a bad case of shingles as memory loss problems is political sophistry bigtree Apr 2023 #60

Lol! You knew as you were writing that that it was ridiculous. Scrivener7 Apr 2023 #61

you're actually compounding unfounded rumor from clickbait articles bigtree Apr 2023 #66

I see you have updated your post. And I see that, once again, you seem unable Scrivener7 Apr 2023 #62

when you attack our senior Senator with false and despicable innuendo bigtree Apr 2023 #65

she announced she wouldn't seek reelection newdayneeded Apr 2023 #92

Why can't she vote remotely or by proxy? nt Samrob Apr 2023 #22

Proxy voting is not permitted in the Senate for roll call votes, only during committee business. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #26

She needs to step down from the Senate if she is not coming back soon. In theory she could end up Celerity Apr 2023 #27

We have a very tough Senate map in 24 too. We could lose the Senate... Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #40

Sigh vercetti2021 Apr 2023 #30

that's not fact bigtree Apr 2023 #32

Do you really think the GOP will help us get judges? We have a tough Senate map Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #51

it's overblown. Feinstein isn't actually responsible for the logjam bigtree Apr 2023 #56

20 judges are nothing compared to the number we could get if she was back...she needs to Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #63

you took a factual report and you just made stuff up bigtree Apr 2023 #64

She needs to resign pinkstarburst Apr 2023 #79

+1 SunSeeker Apr 2023 #89

It appears GOP will allow Schumer to replace Feinstein on Judicary if she resigns. SunSeeker Apr 2023 #104

I can't understand why changing committee members is subject to filibuster. Renew Deal Apr 2023 #34

The senate is filled with dumb rules. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #42

Yes, it's starting to look like Mr.Bill Apr 2023 #83

This war on Feinstein is a lot of hokum from the group not Nixie Apr 2023 #37

Not getting judges when may lose the Senate...could also cost us our Republic in 2024. Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #43

THIS SunSeeker Apr 2023 #74

Then shouldn't we be screaming at Schumer? onenote Apr 2023 #98

Oh well, might as well give in.......... nt Hotler Apr 2023 #57

Why is the GOP fighting tooth and nail to keep Feinstein exactly. where. she. is? NotVeryImportant Apr 2023 #71

Republicans always have to prove that their scum over and over again. done ZonkerHarris Apr 2023 #90

My first thought Delphinus Apr 2023 #93

She's NOT a Dem. Fuck This Cha Apr 2023 #96

Assuming this true, Sinema has never voted against a Biden judicial nomination. onenote Apr 2023 #99

So you think Schumer should agree to Sinema if Mitch suggests her on Monday? SunSeeker Apr 2023 #101

Is she still a democrat? I thought she had switched already. Autumn Apr 2023 #105

She switched to Independent. nt SunSeeker Apr 2023 #106