Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
76. That's based on Assange's claim that his leaking documents
Sat Apr 15, 2023, 10:10 AM
Apr 2023

provided by Russia is "journalism" and that he is a journalist and prosecuting him is an attack on free press.

Today's problems almost entirely result from the failure of people to hold to ethical and workable standards and limits, for ourselves and our institutions. The free press argument requires a very degraded, corrupted, and cynically self serving view of what freedom of the press necessary to a free society should be. I can't speak for the others, but the NYT's political corruption supporting RW power has been intensively studied, measured, and reported by organizations that do just that, and in these troubled times it's still considered by many to be the best newspaper on the planet. It reflects its readers' failure to maintain standards as well, an interactive thing.

Btw, this is how Russia (and the Republicans), set out to destroy the democracies they intend to take over -- by injecting corruption that destroys function and trust in their institutions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nope.......... Lovie777 Apr 2023 #1
Extradite, arraignment, plea deal or stand trial. Tetrachloride Apr 2023 #4
ugh ugh ugh. NO! boston bean Apr 2023 #2
Poorest Timing FeelingBlue Apr 2023 #3
One would think that. I also would not classify as a member of the press. He has been JohnSJ Apr 2023 #6
I'm sure you're not the only one stopdiggin Apr 2023 #9
If I remember correctly, Talib was outspoken against Hillary dlk Apr 2023 #5
I think it's great she is going there womanofthehills Apr 2023 #60
I like the squad, too dlk Apr 2023 #78
+1 betsuni Apr 2023 #74
Strongly disagree stopdiggin Apr 2023 #7
Agreed. I would not characterize him as a member of the press. JohnSJ Apr 2023 #10
yes. (veering off slightly) stopdiggin Apr 2023 #15
Dozens of Australian politicians urge US to abandon Julian Assange extradition Violet_Crumble Apr 2023 #8
I wish Australia would take Rupert Murdoch back. JohnSJ Apr 2023 #12
Urgh, no! That's just cruel n/t Violet_Crumble Apr 2023 #17
lol JohnSJ Apr 2023 #63
I wonder why the other 179 parliament members didn't sign the letter. N/T lapucelle Apr 2023 #14
I don't think it works like that. Violet_Crumble Apr 2023 #16
I wonder why the other 95 members of the US Congressional Progressive Caucus lapucelle Apr 2023 #21
Excuse me? They are exaggerating how many agree with them... RegulatedCapitalistD Apr 2023 #28
Yes, I know. N/T lapucelle Apr 2023 #34
I wonder how you know who was asked and who wasn't... Violet_Crumble Apr 2023 #44
Sea below. lapucelle Apr 2023 #47
Assange waited out the statute of limitations on a rape investigation. lapucelle Apr 2023 #54
Why do you feel his extradition and prosecution should be dropped? bluesbassman Apr 2023 #43
It's because he's been in prison long enough and the US is hypocritical on this one... Violet_Crumble Apr 2023 #46
Meanwhile Reality Winner is still in prison. TheBlackAdder Apr 2023 #48
No she's not - she was released in June 2021. womanofthehills Apr 2023 #57
Oh, thanks., I missed that. 👍 TheBlackAdder Apr 2023 #64
Not sure holing up in an embassy to avoid justice is equivalent to prison. bluesbassman Apr 2023 #61
Dumb move and especially poor timing. yardwork Apr 2023 #11
The usual suspects. Tomconroy Apr 2023 #13
Exactly RegulatedCapitalistD Apr 2023 #29
No RandySF Apr 2023 #18
Assange is a Russian asset...this is a bad move JT45242 Apr 2023 #19
Yep. He was very selective in not condemning anything Russia related. TheBlackAdder Apr 2023 #49
Rapist charges were dropped womanofthehills Apr 2023 #58
Because he hid for ten years JT45242 Apr 2023 #73
Oh, Lord. And Bowman was doing so well for a moment there. Scrivener7 Apr 2023 #20
Poor judgement on their part. LiberalFighter Apr 2023 #22
My.only comment JustAnotherGen Apr 2023 #23
Don't they have more important things to do? mcar Apr 2023 #24
Opposing Democrats...isn't that what they focus on? RegulatedCapitalistD Apr 2023 #30
That seems to be the case mcar Apr 2023 #32
That was my first reaction, and he's is a Russian asset Walleye Apr 2023 #31
Makes one wonder mcar Apr 2023 #33
People who don't remember the Cold War and don't remember what Russia really stands for Walleye Apr 2023 #35
Don't wonder in a post.....DU will ding you for telling that truth. RegulatedCapitalistD Apr 2023 #36
Just like how most Republicans now defend and support Russia, these MPs probably do too. TheBlackAdder Apr 2023 #50
+1 betsuni Apr 2023 #55
Recognize what we are dealing with. Just A Box Of Rain Apr 2023 #25
When they show you who they are RegulatedCapitalistD Apr 2023 #37
Not no...but HELL NO! RegulatedCapitalistD Apr 2023 #26
What is wrong with her? FFS. themaguffin Apr 2023 #27
Propaganda works RegulatedCapitalistD Apr 2023 #38
Tough call for Garland. Exonerate Assange or push the SC to keep the abortion pill legal? JohnSJ Apr 2023 #39
I disagree strongly LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2023 #40
I so disagree with this Delphinus Apr 2023 #41
All the pro-democracy dissidents who died and "disappeared" Hortensis Apr 2023 #42
+++ JohnSJ Apr 2023 #62
Bad idea. moondust Apr 2023 #45
WTF indeed. betsuni Apr 2023 #51
Oh, FFS...NO! sheshe2 Apr 2023 #52
She is in good company: BeckyDem Apr 2023 #53
Glem Greenwald and RT News are in truthout company as well. lapucelle Apr 2023 #59
Note that these people are claiming AMERICA MAY have Hortensis Apr 2023 #65
Excuse me, Daniel Ellsberg is part of an anti-Democratic Party orientation? BeckyDem Apr 2023 #66
Yup, full-fledged "member" of THIS group. They're a type, Hortensis Apr 2023 #67
I believe that is a mistake on your part. We'll have to agree to disagree. BeckyDem Apr 2023 #69
Yup. Me too, and I pat myself on the back every day for Hortensis Apr 2023 #70
Ellsberg didn't see it different at all.Keep in mind 5 established media, The Guardian, NYT, LeMonde BeckyDem Apr 2023 #75
That's based on Assange's claim that his leaking documents Hortensis Apr 2023 #76
Actually, it is the sharp opposite. BeckyDem Apr 2023 #77
+1 betsuni Apr 2023 #72
Oh fuck no ismnotwasm Apr 2023 #56
DURec leftstreet Apr 2023 #68
Oh lord. W_HAMILTON Apr 2023 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tlaib Leads Letter to DOJ...»Reply #76