Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pregnant woman shot by Walgreens employee in East Nashville [View all]Straw Man
(6,943 posts)29. Acc'ding to Tennessee law ...
... pepper spraying some is "assault with bodily injury." I'm sure his lawyer will try to argue self-defense. It will probably be up to a jury to decide. I'm not a lawyer, but I think that unless they continued to assault him after spraying him, his case for self-defense is weak.
As others have said, it's likely that he violated a company rule against carrying a firearm while at work. I'm not sure whether his action of following them out of the store and videotaping them would conflict with company policy about shoplifters, though.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That type of reasoning is why some people should never be allowed to possess guns.
Nevilledog
Apr 2023
#17
There's a huge jump from your scenarios to one in which a violent act already happened.
Ace Rothstein
Apr 2023
#25
I'll stand on my 33 years as a criminal defense attorney. It's not justified self-defense.
Nevilledog
Apr 2023
#21