Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dianne Feinstein digs in [View all]onenote
(46,103 posts)72. Really? There are 49 Republicans. There are, without Feinstein, 50 Democrats.
Even if one is absent, it's still a tie and Harris casts the deciding vote.
It's just simple math.
And have you actually looked at the votes on Biden's nominees? Do you actually think that of the 22 confirmed since January, all but three were secretly Republicans? Because of those 22, only three haven't gotten at least two Republican votes. And of the 59 Biden nominees confirmed in 2022, I believe only two were confirmed without Republican votes.
So I guess we should stop celebrating Biden's success in getting judges approved, eh?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There are a lot of Biden nominees that have made it out of Committee waiting Senate action
onenote
Apr 2023
#18
Excellent post. The judges are a total red herring. The same group didn't prioritize the
Nixie
Apr 2023
#10
+1000. "groups who fail at the ballot box trying another way to seize power."
Hortensis
Apr 2023
#51
What makes you think it will be a few weeks. This is just plain foolish. I find it sad that the
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#11
Ro Khanna is trying to grab a senate seat without voters. I'm glad Feinstein sees through that
Nixie
Apr 2023
#6
I don't give a damn about the politics of this. It is a safe seat. I care only that we don't give
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#13
He wasn't on the Judiciary committee and we still had an overall majority even in his absence
dsc
Apr 2023
#24
Sadly had Justice Ginsburg retired in Obama's first term, we might have avoided Dobs. I think
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#68
Can you describe this "blockade" that Feinstein's absence allegedly has caused?
onenote
Apr 2023
#38
You must be kidding. There won't be any more judges since they can stop it...and do we want
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#69
My brother had shingles. He missed a week from work. There is something else going on here
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#70
There are 18 judges awaiting full senate confirmation. How is her absence preventing them from being
onenote
Apr 2023
#82
Internalized sexism is a thing, yes. And of course, ageism is another reason for the attacks.
Lancero
Apr 2023
#75
Feinstein is 89 and prior to her illness, she missed fewer floor votes than several Democrats
onenote
Apr 2023
#81
True Democrat don't want the Republicans to get more judges and for what...she leaves
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#66
Nancy Pelosi was quite accurate as to why people are piling on Dianne right now.
Lancero
Apr 2023
#71