Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When have Senate Democrats EVER sacrificed an ailing party member to republican obstinacy? [View all]Autumn
(48,965 posts)39. I was not aware of that. Then a replacement could be appointed to the committee?
Sounds like the ideal solution to me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When have Senate Democrats EVER sacrificed an ailing party member to republican obstinacy? [View all]
bigtree
Apr 2023
OP
I believe if the roles were reversed the Republicans would assure their committee majority.
David__77
Apr 2023
#1
then this is about those Democrats, and not a temporarily ailing Sen. Feinstein
bigtree
Apr 2023
#15
We are not Republicans. We did sacrifice a few for petty so called morality bullshit.
Autumn
Apr 2023
#4
Is there a process to insure we get someone appointed on the committee if she resigns?
Autumn
Apr 2023
#21
who will still be sitting there as some republican refuses to allow the new member on the committee
bigtree
Apr 2023
#33
Democrats have pounded the importance of Biden appointing judges or our democracy is gone.
Autumn
Apr 2023
#14
it's worse because Sen. Feinstein hasn't been accused of anything improper, illegal, or wrong
bigtree
Apr 2023
#30
+1000 Well done Autumn...and much more elegant and succinct than my posts...
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#28
I don't see the push for resignation as a response to Republicans playing hardball
Fiendish Thingy
Apr 2023
#7
That is not true. If she resigns, we can appoint someone else to the committee.
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#12
I don't see it as appeasement, I would see her resignation as hardball. Republicans assume Democrats
Vinca
Apr 2023
#9
Okay, then I guess we should be prepared for more right wing judges since we're not getting ours in.
Vinca
Apr 2023
#49
How do you not understand that we won't get any judges unless the Senator comes back
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#11
The bottom line is judges and I am sure you are too intelligent to believe that we can
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#26
You and I both know the Democrats will not change the rules out of fear that when the Pukes
Autumn
Apr 2023
#37
I was under the impression that the nuke option could not be used as it is not about finance...if
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#41
We don't have the votes and 2024 would be too late as I expect we may lose the Senate given
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#38
No it doesn't because once she has resigned she is no longer counted and a simple majority is
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#36
I was not aware of that. Then a replacement could be appointed to the committee?
Autumn
Apr 2023
#39
I have read and heard on MSNBC that if she resigns then a replacement can be appointed...
Demsrule86
Apr 2023
#44
If she resigns, no judeges will be confirmed for the rest of Biden's term
Fiendish Thingy
Apr 2023
#47