General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When have Senate Democrats EVER sacrificed an ailing party member to republican obstinacy? [View all]bigtree
(94,375 posts)...in the real world, a reported recovering Feinstein will likely return to assume her duties on the committee before the nominations ALREADY VOTED OUT and stacked up on the Senate floor can be acted on.
Axios:
Even if Republicans don't acquiesce to replacing Feinstein, that doesn't stop Democrats from confirming nearly 20 judicial nominees already advanced out of Judiciary, noted Josh Chafetz, a law professor at Georgetown University Law Center.
"This all seems a bit premature," he told Axios, "given how many judicial nominees are sitting on the executive calendar. It'll take the Senate a while ... to get through everyone who has already been voted out of committee."
Many of the nominees still before the committee could garner enough GOP support to not be affected, according to a source familiar with the process, who said just a handful of party-line appointments are at risk.
https://www.axios.com/2023/04/13/dems-substitute-feinstein-judiciary-committee
and...
Although the Feinstein absence has caused headaches for the judiciary, and is in part why there have been calls for her to resign, Republicans familiar with the process believe that of the 14 judges yet to be confirmed by the committee, only four or five would need to be confirmed through a party-line vote.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/republicans-want-make-difficult-senate-replace-feinstein-key-panel-rcna79592