Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)
62. Once you have motive, opportunity, and know way to verify how does it matter?
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 03:20 PM
Nov 2012

It seems such conditions are beyond unacceptable for as something as fundamentally important as our voting process.

Concerned about the process or believing in a conspiracy, it makes no functional difference. A sane process makes for less theories and less concern.

Also, sometimes there are actual conspiracies, the word exists in many languages for a reason and before they are proven they are theories. That is the nature of the beast.

The lack of transparency and ability to independently verify EARN such suspicion, to not be somewhat cynical is a dereliction of duty as a citizen.

There is little possibility of a fact based conversation because we have permitted a process where facts are unobtainable and so an argument of circumstantial and anecdotal evidence breaks out.
I would think that even those fairly certain that things are on the up and up would want a process they KNOW is rather than their best guess and most of those that now have questions would not if the mist was rolled back.

Who cares if the glass is half full or half empty? How does that change the volume? There is a half glass of water and that is that, it doesn't change not a single drop based on perspective.

The default position would seem to logically be for transparent and verifiable elections, it is for those who wish to argue that default to convince.The fact that all elections are not transparent and verifiable means that any all questions are deserved and reasonable, in my opinion.

Certainly nothing to be indignant about. Cheating and trying to cheat in election is about as old as voting, it is probably best that cynics have a great purpose in this area.
Plus, the system is an institution. The more faith can be created the better the function and greater the participation which increases the strength, viability, and the broadest benefit of our self governance.

You don't shut the conspiracy minded up by arguing, you do it by eliminating the planks they stand on by cleaning up the process which is as sane a thing as can be no matter how nutty and flaky you think the arguments and people making them are.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bull! Rider3 Nov 2012 #1
Some are not yet ready to re-think their stand. Sheepshank Nov 2012 #2
Rather than be wrong :) Blue4Texas Nov 2012 #3
The expression "double down" WeekendWarrior Nov 2012 #37
+1000 nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #48
That and "meme." When did the word "theme" get replaced with "meme?" And why? Squinch Nov 2012 #57
Sure...what do you have in mind? Sheepshank Nov 2012 #64
Well, "double down" means WeekendWarrior Nov 2012 #66
Utter Nonsense Coyotl Nov 2012 #34
Perhaps re-reading the post might help... Faryn Balyncd Nov 2012 #36
Thank you...I thought I was reading a different post than everyone else. n/t ejbr Nov 2012 #59
You're missing his point. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #42
The operative word is "if" brush Nov 2012 #60
Thanks for posting this important warning from Harvey Wasserman. John1956PA Nov 2012 #4
I think this needs to be our number one priority flamingdem Nov 2012 #6
I appreciate your comment on the thread about the Repub's attempt to split PA's electoral vote block John1956PA Nov 2012 #14
This is exactly right, but since we have to push past the incredulousness of people on the left flamingdem Nov 2012 #29
Problems (and fraud) SHOULD be fixed. But Obama hit 270 BEFORE Ohio was called. Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #56
I can see that. How did anyone get suckered into going with those machines anyway? brewens Nov 2012 #58
Further proof that conspiracy theories never die RomneyLies Nov 2012 #5
What is BBV? flamingdem Nov 2012 #7
"Black Box Voting" the moniker put on this CT back after Kerry lost. nt RomneyLies Nov 2012 #9
Bingo! Such crapola from the CTists. stopbush Nov 2012 #10
As bad as Truthers, Birthers, poll unskewers, and moon landing deniers, IMO n/t RomneyLies Nov 2012 #12
Not to mention the JFK CTists. stopbush Nov 2012 #15
Agreed. Lee Harvey Oswald shared something with Charles Whitman RomneyLies Nov 2012 #17
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #18
+1, HOK. Mc Mike Nov 2012 #38
Indded Just Like They Were Made For Each Other HangOnKids Nov 2012 #43
I was almost afraid to note the similarity, it sounds so 'conspiratorial'. Nt. Mc Mike Nov 2012 #47
The deniers of BBV ? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #13
Rec. PowerToThePeople Nov 2012 #23
I agree. There is a contingent on the left who likes to attack attempts to protect voting integrity flamingdem Nov 2012 #27
Maybe they're not as "left" as they'd wish us to believe? Doremus Nov 2012 #44
I don't think anyone denies the need for a paper audit trail. moriah Nov 2012 #31
2 elections actually. PowerToThePeople Nov 2012 #33
Many of us came to DU after '04 for that very reason, P2P. Doremus Nov 2012 #45
I'm glad you had a good experience. Doremus Nov 2012 #46
As I said, most DUers (including yourself from this post) reject the idea.... moriah Nov 2012 #50
I was a poll worker in '04. Doremus Nov 2012 #61
They let campaigns even do the work out there? moriah Nov 2012 #63
You embarrass yourself equating those who want a verifiable vote flamingdem Nov 2012 #30
Yeah well if "Ifs" and "Buts" were candy and nuts... cherish44 Nov 2012 #8
didn't Nate just say we did not need Ohio and Florida (combined) this time? eom amborin Nov 2012 #11
no we did not. As soon as they called colorado and nevada, it was a done deal. sammytko Nov 2012 #16
The Patriots would have won the Super Bowl had they scored more points than the Giants! Johonny Nov 2012 #19
+1 ProfessorGAC Nov 2012 #22
This is seriously stupid cthulu2016 Nov 2012 #20
And it's not difficult to separate the two flamingdem Nov 2012 #24
Once you have motive, opportunity, and know way to verify how does it matter? TheKentuckian Nov 2012 #62
Here's a good overview of what happened plus sources to check out flamingdem Nov 2012 #21
Ummm.....arithmetic? Tommy_Carcetti Nov 2012 #25
But it didn't. bigwillq Nov 2012 #26
But you better believe that next time flamingdem Nov 2012 #28
Nothing to see here Citizens! Please move along! bleever Nov 2012 #32
And if it all came down to California we'd have a Democratic House Retrograde Nov 2012 #35
+1. Thanks fd, and Freepress. nt. Mc Mike Nov 2012 #39
Very welcome flamingdem Nov 2012 #41
Whatever anyone thinks THERE MUST BE A PAPER BALLOT TRAIL jsmirman Nov 2012 #40
I think there's a real possibility that Ohio WAS rigged by the Republicans. Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #49
But he didn't, so who gives a fuck? Scootaloo Nov 2012 #51
nope. florida results are official. ohio was nice but not needed tjwash Nov 2012 #52
Romney also could've won if more people would've voted for him. phleshdef Nov 2012 #53
There they go again. No, that's not the truth. Obama didn't NEED Ohio to win. CO brought it home. Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #54
Such a bunch of cry babies. We won by over 3 million votes - TBF Nov 2012 #55
I totally agree with Howler Nov 2012 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney would have won if ...»Reply #62