Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,925 posts)
47. No more so than Texas
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 01:58 AM
Jan 2012

Perhaps even less so. Texas was a state 9 years after the Battle of the Alamo. Alaska was a state 16 years after the Japanese occupation of Dutch Harbor ended.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

More FEMA camps? Canuckistanian Jan 2012 #1
Never heard one clear thought from Paul. bluestate10 Jan 2012 #2
Ironically in this economy he has sort of a point nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #3
Isn't ProSense Jan 2012 #4
I will explain you the logic nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #5
Not ProSense Jan 2012 #6
Yes, this is part of it nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #7
Why ProSense Jan 2012 #8
What is "the President's plan to shrink the size of the military"? girl gone mad Jan 2012 #9
And I am thinking of something that is highly Keynseian nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #11
Um, ProSense Jan 2012 #15
I replied to one of your posts and stated as much. girl gone mad Jan 2012 #22
Wait ProSense Jan 2012 #24
I don't have much of an opinion on the matter, to be frank. girl gone mad Jan 2012 #35
Hmmm? ProSense Jan 2012 #42
No you didn't say Obama was attacking the MIC.. girl gone mad Jan 2012 #46
Hmmm? ProSense Jan 2012 #48
"I do think these two politicians sound like they are not so far apart." Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #54
The undeniable fact of the matter is that if Obama was for increasing the size of the military... Bonobo Jan 2012 #41
You're right.. girl gone mad Jan 2012 #43
Clearly ProSense Jan 2012 #44
Nope, I wouldn't spend another red cent on the fiction of using the US military to "defend freedom". Bonobo Jan 2012 #49
"The US military could cut their budget 100% and STILL be bigger" Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #52
Something that is built by an engineering batallion nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #10
Where ProSense Jan 2012 #16
So let me get this nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #23
No ProSense Jan 2012 #27
Oh for fucks sake the military is the most socialized nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #28
What? ProSense Jan 2012 #31
Quick, how many are meant for a drawdown right now? nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #33
There ProSense Jan 2012 #37
Prosense we are in the middle of an overall revision in the doctrine and force structure nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #45
Right ProSense Jan 2012 #56
They are not mutually exclusive nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #58
"Oh for fucks sake the military is the most socialized institution in the US." QFT /nt Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #40
I work in this industry, and that would require a significant shift in policy. joshcryer Jan 2012 #17
I just floated a high policy proposal nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #21
This is not what Ron Paul is suggesting at all. Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #25
I know, why I said not for the reasons Paul is suggesting nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #26
"why I said not for the reasons Paul is suggesting" Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #29
Oh I am not talking of new troops nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #32
The entire point of a WPA is to hire civilians. Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #36
WPA would and should be separate from this nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #39
Here's another idea. Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #50
Give them first preference for federal employment... nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #53
Hmm Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #59
Let's clarify I did not mean a WPA via the military nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #62
Here's how a drawdown works. Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #38
And you look at Reps in those districts, they bloc vote for MIC. joshcryer Jan 2012 #12
I know, but reality is that what Paul is talking is McNeil AF base in every district nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #14
That would be direct competition to contractors, which Ron Paul would be against. joshcryer Jan 2012 #18
There you go nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #20
We're not in danger of invasion treestar Jan 2012 #13
Well, ProSense Jan 2012 #19
Alamo. Dutch Harbor. Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #30
No more so than Texas Major Nikon Jan 2012 #47
Alaska was already a territory (since 1912). Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #51
Learn something new every day treestar Jan 2012 #67
Yeah, I think they had troops on some other Aleutian islands for several months. /nt Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #69
Talk about "small govt". FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #34
In the right context, I'd have to agree. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2012 #55
Yeah, ProSense Jan 2012 #57
Using the military for civilian uses didn't make a whole lot of sense back then and makes less now Major Nikon Jan 2012 #61
Ron Paul wants a stronger national military to keep the zombie hoards at bay. Rex Jan 2012 #60
It's ProSense Jan 2012 #63
I wonder if he'd revive the coastal batteries? BiggJawn Jan 2012 #64
Since we had a lot of posts reinterpreting Ron Paul's position as a potentially good thing... joshcryer Jan 2012 #65
Well, ProSense Jan 2012 #66
To what purpose? jwirr Jan 2012 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ron Paul wants to build m...»Reply #47