Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

scarshapedstar

(2 posts)
9. Medical student here
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 12:59 AM
Jan 2012

I know people are skeptical of Holy Grail terms like "cancer vaccine" but this principle - generate antibodies against a protein that only cancer cells produce - is a dream that many have been working towards for years. Google "prostatic acid phosphatase vaccine" for a similar experiment. I'm an aspiring oncologist and this is why - we live in an age where the focus isn't on finding some miracle chemical 'cure' but rather in helping the body's own immune system to hunt down the cancer cells more thoroughly, less painfully, and with a lower rate of recurrence.

The genetic revolution was a big step for cancer but the proteomic revolution will truly transform the field. If any of you are familiar with herceptin or gleevec, you know that they're very different from the original chemo agents that kill rapidly dividing cells (tumors, mucosa, hair follicles). They target specific vulnerabilities of the cancer cells that were only possible with modern molecular biology techniques.

Throughout the history of oncology, the problem has been that cancer cells just don't look all that different from normal cells. Not nearly enough to, say, find or synthesize a poison that you can be sure will only reach the cancer. It may be possible with Star Trek technology, but not ours.

We don't need that, though, if we can co-opt our own ruthlessly efficient and incredibly adaptable immune systems, and there's two ways to do that. One is to force cancer cells to produce molecular "kill me" signs, which is also in the works. The other, just like this vaccine, is to show the body a cancer-specific protein and say "kill this". Some combination of these two approaches will almost certainly be in the future standard of care, and with the price and time of DNA and protein analysis dropping exponentially (Human Genome Project took 13 years and cost $2.7 billion, and now we can do the same for $1,000 in a week) we will be able to tailor treatments to each patient's specific variant of cancer.

I don't know if this vaccine is all it's cracked up to be, we'll see if it's really The One, but make no mistake, this is what the future WILL look like.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is there a link to a medical journal or scientific publication? nt Xipe Totec Jan 2012 #1
Here is a link FourScore Jan 2012 #4
Those are company press releases, Xipe Totec Jan 2012 #14
I have posted some links in the OP. n/t FourScore Jan 2012 #7
I see them now in your OP. I'll check them out. Thanks! nt Xipe Totec Jan 2012 #15
Impressive work Xipe Totec Jan 2012 #19
And after 8-10 years of testing they will quietly admit that there was no there there bluestateguy Jan 2012 #2
Corporate PR superpatriotman Jan 2012 #3
Smells like a scam. LeftyMom Jan 2012 #5
zombiepocolypse,....nt Demonaut Jan 2012 #6
THC ? 99th_Monkey Jan 2012 #8
Medical student here scarshapedstar Jan 2012 #9
If something's going to work, it will be something like this. Radiation & chemo are crude. DirkGently Jan 2012 #10
thanks for this great explanation! renate Jan 2012 #11
It's a fair question scarshapedstar Jan 2012 #12
It looks like its based on Ralph M Steinman's work on Dendritic Cells. Xipe Totec Jan 2012 #16
Thank you for your input. FourScore Jan 2012 #17
Welcome to DU! DesertRat Jan 2012 #18
If it works- big IF- Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cancer Vaccine for 90 Per...»Reply #9