Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chief Justice John Roberts' Mockery of Stalking Victims Points to a Deeper Problem [View all]ancianita
(42,759 posts)43. Where are the amicus briefs from organizations like Sanctuary for Families.
https://sanctuaryforfamilies.org/femicide-epidemic/
SCOTUS acts like the typical RW Republican -- loss, harm, and damage doesn't matter until it hits THEM.
In the United States, femicide the gender-based killing of women is often thought of as an issue affecting low-income countries. This could not be further from the truth.
Of all femicide cases in high-income countries, 70% occur in the U.S.
To put that into perspective, on a global scale, the U.S. ranks 34th for intentional female homicides at a rate of 2.6 killings per 100,000 women...
The link between gender and violence in the U.S. becomes even more apparent when looking at the demographics of male homicides. Men are significantly more likely to be killed by a stranger than women; strangers kill 29% of male homicide victims compared to only 10% of female victims. And while it is true that some men are murdered by their female partners, intimate partner violence accounts for only about 5% of male homicides. Too often, these occur in the context of women acting in self-defense against their abusive male partners.
Furthermore, when compared to male homicides, femicides tend to be more violent and intimate in nature women are less likely than men to be killed in a shooting, but more likely to be beaten, stabbed, or strangled.
Trans women and women of color face a disproportionate risk
When considering femicide and its implications, we must acknowledge the barriers and disparities affecting marginalized women and how these increase the risk of violence.
Though femicide is a pervasive problem for all women, the reality for women of color is even bleaker men are murdering Black women and girls at a rate almost three times higher than white women.
For indigenous women and girls, the homicide rate is six times higher than it is for their white counterparts, and current or former partners are responsible for 94% of those homicides.
Despite being murdered at higher rates, Black and brown murdered and missing women are not receiving the same media attention and resources as white women.
Of all femicide cases in high-income countries, 70% occur in the U.S.
To put that into perspective, on a global scale, the U.S. ranks 34th for intentional female homicides at a rate of 2.6 killings per 100,000 women...
The link between gender and violence in the U.S. becomes even more apparent when looking at the demographics of male homicides. Men are significantly more likely to be killed by a stranger than women; strangers kill 29% of male homicide victims compared to only 10% of female victims. And while it is true that some men are murdered by their female partners, intimate partner violence accounts for only about 5% of male homicides. Too often, these occur in the context of women acting in self-defense against their abusive male partners.
Furthermore, when compared to male homicides, femicides tend to be more violent and intimate in nature women are less likely than men to be killed in a shooting, but more likely to be beaten, stabbed, or strangled.
Trans women and women of color face a disproportionate risk
When considering femicide and its implications, we must acknowledge the barriers and disparities affecting marginalized women and how these increase the risk of violence.
Though femicide is a pervasive problem for all women, the reality for women of color is even bleaker men are murdering Black women and girls at a rate almost three times higher than white women.
For indigenous women and girls, the homicide rate is six times higher than it is for their white counterparts, and current or former partners are responsible for 94% of those homicides.
Despite being murdered at higher rates, Black and brown murdered and missing women are not receiving the same media attention and resources as white women.
SCOTUS acts like the typical RW Republican -- loss, harm, and damage doesn't matter until it hits THEM.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Chief Justice John Roberts' Mockery of Stalking Victims Points to a Deeper Problem [View all]
Nevilledog
Apr 2023
OP
If the shoe were on the other foot, they wouldn't be laughing, they'd pass a new law
MagickMuffin
Apr 2023
#3
Yep. Innocent protests and the SC gets top of the line expensive security, paid for by taxpayers.
Irish_Dem
Apr 2023
#5
the same court that cried like babies and demanded a new law when peaceful protesters
mopinko
Apr 2023
#6
Stalking is just an extension of domestic violence by an ex-boyfriend or husband.
Lonestarblue
Apr 2023
#12
If you think women are second class citizens this is one more case that proves the point. They are!
flashman13
Apr 2023
#16
This is horrifying. There's such a tiny slice of humanity this SCOTUS finds has any intrinsic value
Hekate
Apr 2023
#21
Just wow. How dreadful to be a hopeful stalking victim and have to hear this. nt
Hortensis
Apr 2023
#25
Stalking is funny, laughable? Just cyber-stalking or all forms? Is following someone
txwhitedove
Apr 2023
#26
As a criminal defense attorney, I find Roberts's behavior disturbing. They have a problem with
Pepsidog
Apr 2023
#27
This is one of those ACLU amicus briefs so focused on minutia it ends up doing harm
NullTuples
Apr 2023
#33
Roberts may have done so to hide the emergent property of there being 1000's of them
NullTuples
Apr 2023
#30
Roberts following the Tucker Carlson routine of cherry-picking data and then laughing at it.
Midnight Writer
Apr 2023
#37
I find it interesting that these guys could so casually lump their mothers together with
vanlassie
Apr 2023
#54
Asking a SCOTUS member with an Opus Dei approval to be reasonable on women's issues
DFW
Apr 2023
#40
Sounds like recess at elementary school. So many assholes with way too much power. nt
Evolve Dammit
Apr 2023
#42
This from the court that sought and got taxpayer funded protection for their personal property
Freethinker65
Apr 2023
#44
If he or his family was on the receiving end, I'd get he'd not be so cavalier about
Bristlecone
Apr 2023
#56
Odd how you can shoot someone in a 'stand your ground' state just because you are fearful.
70sEraVet
Apr 2023
#61