Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WTF is Special Council Jack Smith doing regarding Trump? [View all]Goodheart
(5,760 posts)43. That's why people go to work, generally.
But I don't think it's entirely for the money, though.
Still, I can't see that he feels any rush or incentive to get it done quickly, as has been the case with multiple special prosecutors in the past. trump should have already been charged for what Texeria just got arrested.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, because apparently they don't read reputable news sources. Or choose not to.
emulatorloo
Apr 2023
#26
You should check out Meidas Touch on YouTube. They keep you updated on what Smith is doing...
Thomas Hurt
Apr 2023
#3
Boris Epshsteyn met with Jack Smith's office for multiple hours over 2 days
FelineOverlord
Apr 2023
#7
Yes these posts are getting tiresome, doesn't matter how much it is pointed out what both
Bev54
Apr 2023
#17
They don't bother reading reputable news sources. Pure contrarianism at this point.
emulatorloo
Apr 2023
#27
Smith has only been on the job for five months, and in that time his investigation,
Scrivener7
Apr 2023
#11
Smith. And you, I take it, think it's Garland. We disagree. I can deal with that. Can you?
Scrivener7
Apr 2023
#20
Here is some of the timeline of the 1/6 investigation prior to Smith being appointed.
Bev54
Apr 2023
#22
That's a lovely list. Many of those things have nothing to do with Merrick Garland. Some
Scrivener7
Apr 2023
#25
And who here has said or attempted to stop you from criticizing the govt? nt
MarineCombatEngineer
Apr 2023
#14
Go ahead and criticize but to do so based strictly on your own assumptions and not
Bev54
Apr 2023
#19
Ah playing the victim card. Nobody told you that you can't "criticize the government." Rather
emulatorloo
Apr 2023
#28
Yes. And is presenting it to the relevant Grand Juries, which one would know if they were to read
emulatorloo
Apr 2023
#29