Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(46,228 posts)

8. It would require more than that.

Tue Apr 25, 2023, 11:09 PM

Apr 2023

With or without Feinstein, it's unlikely there are the votes to increase the size of the court.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What to do about a corrupt, authoritarian Supreme Court? [View all] Marius25 Apr 2023 OP

Pack the court before we chance losing the Senate Stinky The Clown Apr 2023 #1

You need the House to pack the court. Marius25 Apr 2023 #4

Ahhh yes... packing the court. WarGamer Apr 2023 #9

It would require more than that. onenote Apr 2023 #8

The court has already been packed. That's the problem. Mister Ed Apr 2023 #16

I wonder how they like their appropriations? C_U_L8R Apr 2023 #2

And how would that work? onenote Apr 2023 #6

Thanks for the detail. Helpful. C_U_L8R Apr 2023 #10

The GOP wants to keep creating constitutional crises. Irish_Dem Apr 2023 #3

"What to do about a corrupt, authoritarian Supreme Court?" J_William_Ryan Apr 2023 #5

So you're in favor of Congress having greater power over SCOTUS? WarGamer Apr 2023 #7

There is only one thing we can do LostOne4Ever Apr 2023 #11

GREAT plan. multigraincracker Apr 2023 #15

Expand it. orthoclad Apr 2023 #12

28 USC 1 Mike Niendorff Apr 2023 #13

Expand the court to 21 seats Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #14

Pass laws zipplewrath Apr 2023 #17