Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Opinion: Why Joe Biden Needs a Primary Challenger [View all]TheFarseer
(9,777 posts)69. No one is trying to silence anyone
Im sure both sides felt like they had to hold back. Because we are essentially in the same side, thats how primaries worked until Trump blundered Onto the scene. Lets just agree that we had different experiences in 2016.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That is totally false.....Let me introduce you to the concept of BernieBros.
RegulatedCapitalistD
May 2023
#58
Democrats are still accused of ignoring the working class and that didn't come from the Right.
betsuni
May 2023
#83
I didn't say anything about supporters or anything about being "censored" in that comment.
betsuni
May 2023
#102
And lets not even bring up Paul Manafort and Tad Devine's history of chumminess.
RegulatedCapitalistD
May 2023
#41
Having supported Hillary in 2008 and voting for her then and in the general in 2016
CentralMass
May 2023
#63
What were the differences between the 2016 and 2020 platforms? You're saying the 2016
betsuni
May 2023
#31
Yes Joe Biden has won something like nine elections so let's just all tell him how to do it
Walleye
May 2023
#3
Ummmmmm....might want to check his registration...he caucus's with us...so does Kristen Sinema.
RegulatedCapitalistD
May 2023
#39
Kamala wasn't even a senator for very long but had an impressive legislative record.
betsuni
May 2023
#20
And before that she was the AG of California 2011-2017, which is not a small job.
Hekate
May 2023
#44
About the only benefit I could see to Biden having minor primary opposition would be it would give
Midwestern Democrat
May 2023
#22
Biden has won a lot of elections. And a lot of debates. He doesn't really need "practice."
emulatorloo
May 2023
#24
Yeah, he was able to have a really easy campaign due to Covid last time, but not this time
liberal_mama
May 2023
#47
Same old "I'd vote for a woman, just not THAT woman" which was supposed to only mean Hillary
betsuni
May 2023
#86
Every time an incumbent president has had a strong primary challenger he has lost.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2023
#33
They lose because a strong primary challenge indicates a weak incumbent.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2023
#104
Biggest mistake of Teddy Kennedy's career was challenging Jimmy Carter. They both lost.
Hekate
May 2023
#42
I think it could be good for Democrats if they were on TV debating the issues...
kentuck
May 2023
#71
There is not unprecendented....we have been headed down this path for decades...
RegulatedCapitalistD
May 2023
#97
NO I do not want to give the impression that we are the ones infighting
RegulatedCapitalistD
May 2023
#101
Any other election I would be okay with a primary challenger. It's any citizens constitutional right
Autumn
May 2023
#98
Two straight-up fascist authoritarian assholes are currently the leading GOP candidates.
LudwigPastorius
May 2023
#107