Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Senator Elizabeth Warren May Not Be Appointed to the Banking Committee [View all]
Last edited Sun Nov 11, 2012, 01:34 PM - Edit history (1)
Imagine that, Democrats working against her. If she doesn't make the Committee, we will all know who is in control of the Senate.
Its hard to fathom but theres at least a fair chance that Elizabeth Warren may not get a seat on the Senate Banking Committee.
Warrens resume makes her a perfect fit for the committee. Her tenure as chair of the Congressional TARP oversight panel gave her a clear view of the intersection of the financial sector and government. In that post she distinguished herself as an independent thinker and critic of both the Obama administration and of banking practices.
Yet we have Senator Jack Reed, a senior Democrat who sits on the Senate Banking Committee, telling Reuters that he wont make a prediction about whether Warren will get on the committee. Other Senators wont comment. Harry Reid is staying silent on the matter.
(snip)
Behind the scenes there are people working to keep her off the committee. A former Senate aide tells me that the banking committee staff does not like Warren and have begun to quietly campaign against her. Lobbyists are telling senior Democrats that Warren might be more effective on the Judiciary Committee, which does bankruptcy oversight.
The staff of the Banking Committee is extremely tight with lobbyists for the banks, many of whom are former members of that staff. The staffers and lobbyists socialize together, drink together, and sometimes even marry. They are elitists who think of themselves as a cut above other Capitol Hill aides. And they pretty much all want jobs at banks someday.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49762821/Elizabeth_Warren_May_Not_Make_the_Banking_Committee
Warrens resume makes her a perfect fit for the committee. Her tenure as chair of the Congressional TARP oversight panel gave her a clear view of the intersection of the financial sector and government. In that post she distinguished herself as an independent thinker and critic of both the Obama administration and of banking practices.
Yet we have Senator Jack Reed, a senior Democrat who sits on the Senate Banking Committee, telling Reuters that he wont make a prediction about whether Warren will get on the committee. Other Senators wont comment. Harry Reid is staying silent on the matter.
(snip)
Behind the scenes there are people working to keep her off the committee. A former Senate aide tells me that the banking committee staff does not like Warren and have begun to quietly campaign against her. Lobbyists are telling senior Democrats that Warren might be more effective on the Judiciary Committee, which does bankruptcy oversight.
The staff of the Banking Committee is extremely tight with lobbyists for the banks, many of whom are former members of that staff. The staffers and lobbyists socialize together, drink together, and sometimes even marry. They are elitists who think of themselves as a cut above other Capitol Hill aides. And they pretty much all want jobs at banks someday.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49762821/Elizabeth_Warren_May_Not_Make_the_Banking_Committee
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senator Elizabeth Warren May Not Be Appointed to the Banking Committee [View all]
Oilwellian
Nov 2012
OP
Then The President Must Use Some Of His Political Capital To Force The Issue.....
global1
Nov 2012
#3
Wow, sometimes it is very difficult to defend against the "both parties suck" meme. nt
Comrade_McKenzie
Nov 2012
#4
If Dems succeed in keeping Warren off the Banking Committee, they will also
coalition_unwilling
Nov 2012
#6
Have you forgotten the last 12 years? Does the phrase "keeping our powder dry"
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2012
#13
K&R (This is more important than betray-us' disappearing soon waste of time.)
Amonester
Nov 2012
#22