Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(55,357 posts)

5. Wait, wait, what? Clarence voted with the Court??

Fri May 12, 2023, 04:02 PM

May 2023

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The ruling is good news gratuitous May 2023 #1

I Also Thought It Quite Important ProfessorGAC May 2023 #2

It was an easy case for conservatives to side with Sympthsical May 2023 #4

Thanks ProfessorGAC May 2023 #6

Big implications RandySF May 2023 #3

Wait, wait, what? Clarence voted with the Court?? no_hypocrisy May 2023 #5

Good. underpants May 2023 #7

Maybe they can see society splintering and decided to be humane for once bucolic_frolic May 2023 #8

My take is more cynical not fooled May 2023 #9

The Headline Is Bullshit Click-Bait. There Was No Decision About Pronouns. MayReasonRule May 2023 #10

The headline is accurate. They used her proper pronouns in the ruling. Nevilledog May 2023 #12

How Does Dicta "Affirm" Anything? It's Merely Used "In Passing", Right? MayReasonRule May 2023 #16

Because they're affirming that she identifies as a woman. Nevilledog May 2023 #18

Best I Can Tell They Merely Quoted The Dicta From The Prior Case MayReasonRule May 2023 #19

The Biden administration was seeking to deport this person. former9thward May 2023 #11

Thank you, Justice Jackson. Aristus May 2023 #17