Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Paula Broadwell 'leaked secret details of Benghazi probe during speech' [View all]justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)13. Here's my best theory on this
The President didn't want to put boots on the ground in Libya. So, the CIA went in to work its "magic." The CIA was probably using that place to question Qaddafi supporters/terrorists and the Libyans knew of this (this goes back to the list of Libyans that were working with US leaked by Issa and the article below talking about finding shoulder-fired missiles).
I had read somewhere that the house that Stevens was at was a temporary "consulate." The CIA annex was about a mile away. So, if they were indeed trying to free detainees, they hit the wrong building.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/11/usa-libya-annex-idUSL1E8L9E1220121011
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Paula Broadwell 'leaked secret details of Benghazi probe during speech' [View all]
elehhhhna
Nov 2012
OP
This whole thing reeks like something from a really bad political spy thriller.
gordianot
Nov 2012
#2
Oh I'm 110% sure the CIA would deny. Of course they'd deny. No consulate should be a jail
riderinthestorm
Nov 2012
#8
Except the two men killed trying to protect Stevens worked for Blackwater not the CIA.
Bandit
Nov 2012
#24
Investigators didn't get there for a long time. Plenty of time to disappear inconvenient things
riderinthestorm
Nov 2012
#14
I have no idea. Nobody has any idea. "We" (the US officials) didn't get there for more than 24 hrs
riderinthestorm
Nov 2012
#9
No trouble assuming that. In fact, I believe that's a badly kept secret. But a detention facility?
riderinthestorm
Nov 2012
#16
why is she a mistress. they are both married, adulters, how does this make her a mistress? is he a
seabeyond
Nov 2012
#11
Earlier that day, Fox news had claimed prisoners were temporarily held in an annex
magical thyme
Nov 2012
#17
She does have a top security clearance, and she's active duty reserves.
riderinthestorm
Nov 2012
#22