Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,072 posts)
4. It is generally agreed by legal scholars that this provision cannot be constitutionally applied
Thu Jun 8, 2023, 11:41 PM
Jun 2023

to the president.

The Constitution specifies that the only way to remove a president is via impeachment. And it sets the requirements for the office and the Courts have been clear that Congress cannot add to those requirements.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Love the picture. Fitting. live love laugh Jun 2023 #1
+++ brer cat Jun 2023 #16
Seems imporant! K&R Qutzupalotl Jun 2023 #2
Only if he is convicted and found guilty? JohnSJ Jun 2023 #3
It is generally agreed by legal scholars that this provision cannot be constitutionally applied onenote Jun 2023 #4
I'd think that would be apt bigtree Jun 2023 #9
Before anyone gets too excited about this... regnaD kciN Jun 2023 #5
+1 onenote Jun 2023 #7
Please Mme. Defarge Jun 2023 #6
Which makes all the MAGA fearful, e.g. McCarthy, so much more humorous. herding cats Jun 2023 #8
I've read so much this evening..so can't remember where I saw it. But this poster was saying PortTack Jun 2023 #10
So if someone can prove he tore up, flushed, swallowed, forgotmylogin Jun 2023 #11
A KEEPER! calimary Jun 2023 #12
It will not withstand Constitutional scrutiny..... . Next. Celerity Jun 2023 #13
Doesn't apply to the President DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2023 #14
Civics seems to be a lost subject in our education system. brooklynite Jun 2023 #15
cute bigtree Jun 2023 #17
The article you cite is about the CONSTITUTION (14th Amendment), not the Statutes cited in the OP brooklynite Jun 2023 #18
it's obviously not about this case, with no clear picture of charges bigtree Jun 2023 #19
Unfortunately, that's not one of the charges in the indictment. n/t Qutzupalotl Jun 2023 #20
oh, well. bigtree Jun 2023 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If 'Conspiracy to Conceal...»Reply #4