Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,157 posts)
49. He says he "thinks" the clerk treated it as a related case. But he doesn't know that.
Sun Jun 11, 2023, 04:14 PM
Jun 2023

He says "she noted that it is a referral to case 23-801" and "checked the box of a related case which was regarding the search warrant."

Well, that could be, but he certainly doesn't show us the documentation where she "noted" the related case status of the indictment or where she "checked the box." The document he showed us is a copy of the indictment that, as he says, we've all seen. As far as I can tell he's just speculating. And it is curious that the one document we do have access to -- the trial attorney certificate attached to the indictment at the time it was filed -- expressly indicates that this case is not related to any previous case. The case number assigned to the case brought by the Special Counsel -- 23-80101-CR -- has no relationship to the case number assigned to Trump's challenge to the search warrant filed in August 2022 -- 22-81294-CIV.

My initial reaction was similar when I heard Cannon was assigned the case -- that it probably was because it was a related case. But nothing I've seen so far, including the video from Medias, shows that to be more than speculation.

Finally, my apologies and mea culpa if I somehow missed where he showed "the certificate that the clerk filled out". If it's on the video, can you point me to where it was shown?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Was she really chosen at random? dalton99a Jun 2023 #1
Yep. Right after discarding the first two choices. Kablooie Jun 2023 #17
The Lord works in mysterious ways in Florida dalton99a Jun 2023 #18
It is decided H2O Man Jun 2023 #47
Appealable presumably, and almost certainly would be. Frasier Balzov Jun 2023 #2
No, it was a set up to make Garland, Smith and the Democrats look like fools! AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2023 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Marius25 Jun 2023 #27
Post removed Post removed Jun 2023 #3
Well said..because we all known this highly educated Harvard law school graduate chosen to PortTack Jun 2023 #5
Thus has been chewed to death here. nt GenThePerservering Jun 2023 #6
Yup..the last time she tried to make a stand for the orange anus, nothing worked out for him PortTack Jun 2023 #7
Joyce Vance says chowder66 Jun 2023 #8
Notice the caveat of before jeopardy attaches. Marius25 Jun 2023 #29
Yes but it makes me think that if this were to happen SC would move to have her removed. chowder66 Jun 2023 #37
It's too late at that point. Marius25 Jun 2023 #38
Shows you what I don't know. Thanks. chowder66 Jun 2023 #39
Cannon being assigned is simply bad luck liberalmediaaddict Jun 2023 #9
It appears that almost no-one fully understands how the assignment process works onenote Jun 2023 #25
Judge Cannon will recuse herself. HubertHeaver Jun 2023 #10
If she cares about her future judicial career viva la Jun 2023 #11
No she won't. She's a MAGA judge. They don't recuse Marius25 Jun 2023 #28
She's in the cult. Dismissing this case will only ELEVATE her standing with Republicans Arazi Jun 2023 #32
DISMISS? Will NOT happen, imo. Too serious. apcalc Jun 2023 #12
The question would be Resistance1 Jun 2023 #13
These 'no big deal" responses are misguided Doc Sportello Jun 2023 #14
She doesn't have to care about her career. Her appointment is for life. dalton99a Jun 2023 #15
The 11th ruled that she had no jurisdiction over the first documents case, so it should stay ancianita Jun 2023 #16
The lack of jurisdiction wasn't based on her being assigned the special master case onenote Jun 2023 #22
...and DOJ has the power to appeal any such arbitrary ruling. brooklynite Jun 2023 #19
You can't appeal a directed verdict after the jury is seated. Marius25 Jun 2023 #24
We have the power to stop repeating crap. we can do it Jun 2023 #20
This is so very wrong. I feel abused, and violated. Roisin Ni Fiachra Jun 2023 #21
You are correct. If the Jury is seated and she dismisses the case Marius25 Jun 2023 #23
+1. In the previous case Cannon went out of her way to help Trump at every turn dalton99a Jun 2023 #26
Double Jeopardy -New Jersey Prince99 Jun 2023 #41
In general, motions to dismiss can be filed pre-trial or after the close of the prosecution's case onenote Jun 2023 #30
Right, but then the defense could request directed verdict Marius25 Jun 2023 #31
Marius, can #Traitor ask for a bench trial? Arazi Jun 2023 #33
He could request one yes. Marius25 Jun 2023 #34
Thanks. So at least that's not gonna happen Arazi Jun 2023 #35
Well, it's unlikely but Judge Cannon could grant him one Marius25 Jun 2023 #36
She was not assigned this case by random action grantcart Jun 2023 #40
Joyce Vance said it was random out of a pool of 7 judges Marius25 Jun 2023 #42
Trump was not guaranteed to get her as the judge in the Special Master case. onenote Jun 2023 #43
They showed the copy of the certificate that the clerk filled out grantcart Jun 2023 #44
Here is the video grantcart Jun 2023 #45
Noble said Cannon's assignment is permanent dalton99a Jun 2023 #46
He says he "thinks" the clerk treated it as a related case. But he doesn't know that. onenote Jun 2023 #49
She does. She won't. WarGamer Jun 2023 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Aileen Cannon has t...»Reply #49