Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Katy Tur is a sham. [View all] LiberalFighter Jun 2023 OP
Care to elaborate? SharonClark Jun 2023 #1
Probably because she gave equal time to Robert Ray grantcart Jun 2023 #39
Never watch her montanacowboy Jun 2023 #2
Let's cut the "Mrs. Greenspan" crap, shall we? Ocelot II Jun 2023 #5
I agree both Mrs. Tony Dokoupil and Polly Hennessey Jun 2023 #8
Name calling is a SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2023 #11
In Fact, She Never Took Al's Name ProfessorGAC Jun 2023 #15
That makes it even worse. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #16
It Does, Indeed ProfessorGAC Jun 2023 #17
That's common in journalism once a woman has a byline or a host name, it's not allegorical oracle Jun 2023 #35
She Is Legally Mitchell ProfessorGAC Jun 2023 #47
Poor Al. Perhaps we should refer to him as the husband whose wife never took his name or Polly Hennessey Jun 2023 #44
Exactly. Her last name is not Greenspan. MineralMan Jun 2023 #28
+1 demmiblue Jun 2023 #34
Thank you mcar Jun 2023 #43
I mean what about drumpf? edisdead Jun 2023 #49
Whataboutwhataboutwhatabout? Ocelot II Jun 2023 #50
Just curious. There are a lot of rule makers about these days. edisdead Jun 2023 #51
"Drumpf" is actually TFG's family's original surname. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #52
But it isn't his name edisdead Jun 2023 #60
The only drama comes from the pushback against those who call out sexist garbage. MrsCoffee Jun 2023 #71
Well if you "never watch her" TheProle Jun 2023 #20
...And? Ocelot II Jun 2023 #3
No. Sam is the Sham ... marble falls Jun 2023 #4
Watch it now, watch it. Sneederbunk Jun 2023 #7
Sham 69.......... FTW Celerity Jun 2023 #59
I have a Sham Wow. Marcus IM Jun 2023 #6
A first rate malaise Jun 2023 #9
Sham on her lame54 Jun 2023 #10
Care to explain? Words are free on DU. MineralMan Jun 2023 #12
Don't get in the way of a completely emotional response... Caliman73 Jun 2023 #24
Oh, I'm not in the way. I'm just pointing out that MineralMan Jun 2023 #26
100% Agree. Caliman73 Jun 2023 #27
I've known that for a long time. nt BlueLucy Jun 2023 #13
Then don't watch her. Raftergirl Jun 2023 #14
Don't care for her coverage either. triron Jun 2023 #18
You got that right. Bigwigs on live TV are CIA pre-approved. Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #19
Wow! K&R Pathwalker Jun 2023 #23
Doesn't this belong in the Creative Speculation forum Ocelot II Jun 2023 #29
No, it was written by Carl Bernstein, the journalist who broke Watergate. Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #30
Was also extremely uncovered by the Church commission, congressional investigation lostnfound Jun 2023 #56
Putin may be starting to get suspicious. nt allegorical oracle Jun 2023 #38
Of the ones on the list I know ExWhoDoesntCare Jun 2023 #55
ABC and the Rise of Rush Limbaugh Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #64
Even that nearly 50-year-old story doesn't say "Bigwigs on live TV are CIA pre-approved" Silent3 Jun 2023 #57
Good catch! So what? Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #61
So what? You turned bad-enough to an incredibly over-broad paranoid generalization... Silent3 Jun 2023 #63
Show what's false. Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #65
You made the accusation, "Bigwigs on live TV are CIA pre-approved." The burden of proof is on you... Silent3 Jun 2023 #67
So, I can't express my thoughts and opinions about the facts? Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #68
You can do anything you like... Silent3 Jun 2023 #69
"Conspiratorial mindset." Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #72
Actually, a conspiratorial mindset... Silent3 Jun 2023 #73
Making it personal when it comes to criticizing CIA for its influence on US news is a sign, too. Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #74
My feeling are not at all hurt. Silent3 Jun 2023 #77
Good. CIA uses US media as a Mighty Wurlitzer. Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #78
Why?? MustLoveBeagles Jun 2023 #21
I thought DU loved her a few years back. SYFROYH Jun 2023 #22
She was popular for a bit ... Caliman73 Jun 2023 #25
I have found the complaints to be pretty bogus. God forbid that any tv anchor ever have ... Hekate Jun 2023 #33
Figured djt was actually hoping to have a grab at her. nt allegorical oracle Jun 2023 #40
Trump called her "little Katie Tur" Raine Jun 2023 #48
I like Katy Tur PatSeg Jun 2023 #54
Because she scheduled a Trump supporter before she had a serious person on? Hekate Jun 2023 #31
Robert Ray grantcart Jun 2023 #37
Thanks. Who followed him? For some reason I thought it was Figliuzzi, but maybe only because ... Hekate Jun 2023 #46
Call your Congresscritter, RIGHT FUCKING NOW!! madinmaryland Jun 2023 #32
Always amazing how loyal a viewership the hated news personalities have... brooklynite Jun 2023 #36
Right inthewind21 Jun 2023 #76
Fame is a wonderful thing. Polly Hennessey Jun 2023 #41
Is this another "I hate _____ because they had _____ on their show"? betsuni Jun 2023 #42
Yeah, pretty much. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #53
Well, when you engage in pillow talk mercuryblues Jun 2023 #45
Huh. Trump doesn't like her either. Go figure. eShirl Jun 2023 #58
I try to avoid her. Not my style ecstatic Jun 2023 #62
??? Thanks for the detailed post! USALiberal Jun 2023 #66
LOL, no kidding 🤣. Emile Jun 2023 #70
lol ok nt Torchlight Jun 2023 #79
It's so funny when people here fall out of love with their cable news heroes. BannonsLiver Jun 2023 #75
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Katy Tur is a sham.