Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,155 posts)
36. Mueller She Wrote reads more into Vance's discussion of CIPA than it merits
Wed Jun 14, 2023, 04:41 PM
Jun 2023

Vance is right that there is right of interlocutory appeal under CIPA. But Mueller She Wrote overstates the significance in that right. As Vance acknowledges, CIPA allows an interlocutory appeal with respect to a narrow category of rulings relating to whether the government has to provide the defense with unredacted copies of confidential, classified documents. Such disputes don't always arise and, keep in mind, the government didn't raise a CIPA-related objection to Trump's attorneys getting access to the classified documents seized from Mar-a-Lago in the search warrant/Special Master related case. It's far from clear at this point whether there will be a CIPA-related dispute between Trump's attorneys and the DOJ that would require Cannon to make a ruling.

Most importantly, CIPA would not come into play, and would not create a right of an immediate appeal, with respect to any other actions taken by Cannon before or after the trial, such as scheduling orders and orders on the admissibility of evidence, such as Corcoran's statements.

So any suggestion that CIPA means there's nothing to worry about is wildly misplaced.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

she's a fake judge. She's a real Federalist Society political operative. TomDaisy Jun 2023 #1
That is the truth of it. ...nt 2naSalit Jun 2023 #32
So the most important case goes to the worst and least qualified judge dalton99a Jun 2023 #2
And it's the second time this "random system" picked her for a Trump trial. raging moderate Jun 2023 #4
Very suspicious if you ask me. brush Jun 2023 #11
First time was not random... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #33
One could argue that the fix is in. Magoo48 Jun 2023 #13
Any idea how she was actually chosen - coin flip, ouija board, computer, etc.? A serious question. TheRickles Jun 2023 #29
Good question! ShazzieB Jun 2023 #31
There should be a seniority requirement. LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #3
She should recuse herself now... kentuck Jun 2023 #5
It's the ole catch 22 BOSSHOG Jun 2023 #12
or consequences / penalties Locrian Jun 2023 #34
Supreme Court nomination... kentuck Jun 2023 #38
Coincidence takes a lot of planning... Hekate Jun 2023 #6
It is a very beautiful coincidence dalton99a Jun 2023 #7
A beautiful day in the neighborhood ... Hekate Jun 2023 #8
And probably zero security clearance C_U_L8R Jun 2023 #9
They don't need clearance, it's inherent to the position as judge. Nevilledog Jun 2023 #10
Trial Of The Century, and we get a rookie judge. Wednesdays Jun 2023 #14
We don't have to worry about Aileen. Here's why: Native Jun 2023 #15
+1000 ancianita Jun 2023 #22
My pleasure. I'm looking forward to the podcast this weekend. Native Jun 2023 #23
Cool. But here's the thing. ancianita Jun 2023 #24
Mueller She Wrote reads more into Vance's discussion of CIPA than it merits onenote Jun 2023 #36
28 months and counting republianmushroom Jun 2023 #16
'Random', my ass. She will let him off scot-free. CousinIT Jun 2023 #17
She's not qualified. ... aggiesal Jun 2023 #18
They not only don't care, they WANT it that way..... lastlib Jun 2023 #27
Jack Smith has the right to request a different judge. CaptainTruth Jun 2023 #19
He has the right to move for her recusal under the law. Which will be denied under the law. onenote Jun 2023 #20
Experts can & do disagree on important matters. CaptainTruth Jun 2023 #35
Yes they do. But the cases she cites are not "persuasive" precedent. onenote Jun 2023 #37
If she's that unfit, Mr. Smith has a great opportunity to provide her a "teaching" moment. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #21
IOW, she's a midget in a land of giants. lastlib Jun 2023 #25
14 whole days of trial experience on the bench - yet another Repug pretender. NoMoreRepugs Jun 2023 #26
+1 dalton99a Jun 2023 #39
But she is very experienced in kissing his butt RainCaster Jun 2023 #28
The article misrepresents her experience. onenote Jun 2023 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge in Trump Documents ...»Reply #36