Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

kentuck

(115,415 posts)

38. Supreme Court nomination...

Reply to Locrian (Reply #34)

Wed Jun 14, 2023, 06:05 PM

Jun 2023

Do a favor, like Bork, and get nominated. Then, get shot down.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge in Trump Documents Case Has Scant Criminal Trial Experience [View all] Nevilledog Jun 2023 OP

she's a fake judge. She's a real Federalist Society political operative. TomDaisy Jun 2023 #1

That is the truth of it. ...nt 2naSalit Jun 2023 #32

So the most important case goes to the worst and least qualified judge dalton99a Jun 2023 #2

And it's the second time this "random system" picked her for a Trump trial. raging moderate Jun 2023 #4

Very suspicious if you ask me. brush Jun 2023 #11

First time was not random... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #33

One could argue that the fix is in. Magoo48 Jun 2023 #13

Any idea how she was actually chosen - coin flip, ouija board, computer, etc.? A serious question. TheRickles Jun 2023 #29

Good question! ShazzieB Jun 2023 #31

There should be a seniority requirement. LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #3

She should recuse herself now... kentuck Jun 2023 #5

It's the ole catch 22 BOSSHOG Jun 2023 #12

or consequences / penalties Locrian Jun 2023 #34

Supreme Court nomination... kentuck Jun 2023 #38

Coincidence takes a lot of planning... Hekate Jun 2023 #6

It is a very beautiful coincidence dalton99a Jun 2023 #7

A beautiful day in the neighborhood ... Hekate Jun 2023 #8

And probably zero security clearance C_U_L8R Jun 2023 #9

They don't need clearance, it's inherent to the position as judge. Nevilledog Jun 2023 #10

Trial Of The Century, and we get a rookie judge. Wednesdays Jun 2023 #14

We don't have to worry about Aileen. Here's why: Native Jun 2023 #15

+1000 ancianita Jun 2023 #22

My pleasure. I'm looking forward to the podcast this weekend. Native Jun 2023 #23

Cool. But here's the thing. ancianita Jun 2023 #24

Mueller She Wrote reads more into Vance's discussion of CIPA than it merits onenote Jun 2023 #36

28 months and counting republianmushroom Jun 2023 #16

'Random', my ass. She will let him off scot-free. CousinIT Jun 2023 #17

She's not qualified. ... aggiesal Jun 2023 #18

They not only don't care, they WANT it that way..... lastlib Jun 2023 #27

Jack Smith has the right to request a different judge. CaptainTruth Jun 2023 #19

He has the right to move for her recusal under the law. Which will be denied under the law. onenote Jun 2023 #20

Experts can & do disagree on important matters. CaptainTruth Jun 2023 #35

Yes they do. But the cases she cites are not "persuasive" precedent. onenote Jun 2023 #37

If she's that unfit, Mr. Smith has a great opportunity to provide her a "teaching" moment. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #21

IOW, she's a midget in a land of giants. lastlib Jun 2023 #25

14 whole days of trial experience on the bench - yet another Repug pretender. NoMoreRepugs Jun 2023 #26

+1 dalton99a Jun 2023 #39

But she is very experienced in kissing his butt RainCaster Jun 2023 #28

The article misrepresents her experience. onenote Jun 2023 #30