Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

frazzled

(18,402 posts)

2. Then why can I see it on YouTube right now?

Reply to KamaAina (Original post)

Tue Jan 17, 2012, 02:45 PM

Jan 2012

Frankly, I think it was wrong to give copyright to the family, given that this was a televised "news event." But the court case was settled. I don't think it should reflect on all of copyright law, however.

On Edit: took down link to YouTube, in case it's an issue.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It costs ten bucks to watch MLK's "I Have A Dream" speech. Ouch. [View all] KamaAina Jan 2012 OP

That counter-argument is bizarre cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #1

His kids have fought with each other 4 years while allowing his memorial to all but fall to weeds... hlthe2b Jan 2012 #3

Then why can I see it on YouTube right now? frazzled Jan 2012 #2

Yea, I just looked it up too. Came right up on Google. tridim Jan 2012 #5

You mean this speech that's playing on my PC right now? snooper2 Jan 2012 #4

Here's an article with more on the issue starroute Jan 2012 #6

MLK site: "Unlicensed use of the speech or a part of it can still be lawful in some circumstances .. frazzled Jan 2012 #7

As is often the case... MellowDem Jan 2012 #9

I wonder if Yahoo news is similarly exercised about Disney copyrights? gratuitous Jan 2012 #8

Past a certain point, the U.S. should charge a corporate copyright holder for the rights. bigmonkey Jan 2012 #11