Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

brush

(61,033 posts)

5. The J6 Committee Hearings is what shamed Garland into taking action...

Reply to Autumn (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 19, 2023, 02:20 PM

Jun 2023

finally. And it was much delayed as you said.

trump would've already been tried and probably convicted if Garland's DOJ had started it's investigation of the ATTEMPTED COUP AGAINST THE US GOVERNMENT as soon as his appointment as AG was approved.

That should've been his mandate to proceed immediately.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ had to be shamed into investigating a guy who tried to overthrow the government. [View all] onecaliberal Jun 2023 OP

This is our government montanacowboy Jun 2023 #1

There should have been a massive housecleaning Sky Jewels Jun 2023 #2

We got screwed in 2016 by the DOJ (FBI) triron Jun 2023 #7

Also true. Sky Jewels Jun 2023 #8

They declined it TWICE. I would love to know what really finally made Garland Autumn Jun 2023 #3

But, but, but, he doesn't talk about investigations. onecaliberal Jun 2023 #4

The J6 Committee Hearings is what shamed Garland into taking action... brush Jun 2023 #5

When I saw Garland talking about Smith investigating Trump. Autumn Jun 2023 #10

How dare you! How dare you! Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2023 #13

I know right?? Autumn Jun 2023 #17

Our fantastic DOJ Ponietz Jun 2023 #6

Equal treatment under the law says nothing about those above it. Hermit-The-Prog Jun 2023 #9

Tis true triron Jun 2023 #11

Beautiful. So to the point. brush Jun 2023 #12

No. Are you talking about the guy who was just indicted MineralMan Jun 2023 #14

It's a comment on information that came out today on the DOJ. Autumn Jun 2023 #16

DISGUSTING Skittles Jun 2023 #15

but I thought he was dotting I's and crossing T's. . Emile Jun 2023 #18

They didn't hesitate to go after Hunter Biden or Andrew Gillium. ecstatic Jun 2023 #19

Has inthewind21 Jun 2023 #21

Hey. Any idea why Pence was cleared of the classified document(s) he had while the investigation Autumn Jun 2023 #22

Looks like all of us who don't like Merrick Garland were vindicated Marius25 Jun 2023 #20

I take no pleasure in that. ecstatic Jun 2023 #23

I don't feel vindicated by the fact that things were being handled just as badly as I thought Scrivener7 Jun 2023 #24