Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: On Nicole Wallace right now: Garland, Wray, prevented FBI, DOJ from investigating Trump [View all]Celerity
(55,039 posts)12. here
FBI resisted opening probe into Trumps role in Jan. 6 for more than a year
In the DOJs investigation of Jan. 6, key Justice officials also quashed an early plan for a task force focused on people in Trumps orbit
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/06/19/fbi-resisted-opening-probe-into-trumps-role-jan-6-more-than-year/
https://archive.is/XkShY
snip
Whether a decision about Trumps culpability for Jan. 6 could have come any earlier is unclear. The delays in examining that question began before Garland was even confirmed. Sherwin, senior Justice Department officials and Paul Abbate, the top deputy to FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, quashed a plan by prosecutors in the U.S. attorneys office to directly investigate Trump associates for any links to the riot, deeming it premature, according to five individuals familiar with the decision. Instead, they insisted on a methodical approach focusing first on rioters and going up the ladder.
The strategy was embraced by Garland, Monaco and Wray. They remained committed to it even as evidence emerged of an organized, weeks-long effort by Trump and his advisers before Jan. 6 to pressure state leaders, Justice officials and Vice President Mike Pence to block the certification of Bidens victory.
In the weeks before Jan. 6, Trump supporters boasted publicly that they had submitted fake electors on his behalf, but the Justice Department declined to investigate the matter in February 2021, The Post found. The department did not actively probe the effort for nearly a year, and the FBI did not open an investigation of the electors scheme until April 2022, about 15 months after the attack.
snip
A decision was made early on to focus DOJ resources on the riot, said one former Justice Department official familiar with the debates. The notion of opening up on Trump and high-level political operatives was seen as fraught with peril. When Lisa and Garland came on board, they were fully onboard with that approach. Some prosecutors even had the impression that Trump had become a taboo topic at Main Justice. Colleagues responsible for preparing briefing materials and updates for Garland and Monaco were warned to focus on foot soldiers and to avoid mentioning Trump or his close allies.
snip
In the DOJs investigation of Jan. 6, key Justice officials also quashed an early plan for a task force focused on people in Trumps orbit
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/06/19/fbi-resisted-opening-probe-into-trumps-role-jan-6-more-than-year/
https://archive.is/XkShY
snip
Whether a decision about Trumps culpability for Jan. 6 could have come any earlier is unclear. The delays in examining that question began before Garland was even confirmed. Sherwin, senior Justice Department officials and Paul Abbate, the top deputy to FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, quashed a plan by prosecutors in the U.S. attorneys office to directly investigate Trump associates for any links to the riot, deeming it premature, according to five individuals familiar with the decision. Instead, they insisted on a methodical approach focusing first on rioters and going up the ladder.
The strategy was embraced by Garland, Monaco and Wray. They remained committed to it even as evidence emerged of an organized, weeks-long effort by Trump and his advisers before Jan. 6 to pressure state leaders, Justice officials and Vice President Mike Pence to block the certification of Bidens victory.
In the weeks before Jan. 6, Trump supporters boasted publicly that they had submitted fake electors on his behalf, but the Justice Department declined to investigate the matter in February 2021, The Post found. The department did not actively probe the effort for nearly a year, and the FBI did not open an investigation of the electors scheme until April 2022, about 15 months after the attack.
snip
A decision was made early on to focus DOJ resources on the riot, said one former Justice Department official familiar with the debates. The notion of opening up on Trump and high-level political operatives was seen as fraught with peril. When Lisa and Garland came on board, they were fully onboard with that approach. Some prosecutors even had the impression that Trump had become a taboo topic at Main Justice. Colleagues responsible for preparing briefing materials and updates for Garland and Monaco were warned to focus on foot soldiers and to avoid mentioning Trump or his close allies.
snip
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
On Nicole Wallace right now: Garland, Wray, prevented FBI, DOJ from investigating Trump [View all]
lees1975
Jun 2023
OP
political bias charges from the Rethugs would have been launched no matter what
Celerity
Jun 2023
#44
I am so angry I could spit. MFers, each and every one of those 'head'bastards
NotHardly
Jun 2023
#30
Except no rational person would think the FBI or DOJ has the "political" data that is good ...
uponit7771
Jun 2023
#62
If the person commiting the crimes is a polticial person, fuckit, investigate and arrest period!
NotHardly
Jun 2023
#36
I'll wait until everything gets laid out for us to see in this before I'll go that far.
lees1975
Jun 2023
#13
How long did it take to figure out that Trump was deeply involved and behind it?
lees1975
Jun 2023
#19
Probably a few hours for any of us who were watching TV that day. Some people in Congress
Autumn
Jun 2023
#35
It was all fucking televised. Speaking of video when do you think we peons will ever get to
Autumn
Jun 2023
#37
I absolutely agree with all you said. I never had any confidence in him but was afraid of getting
SheilaAnn
Jun 2023
#39
There were numerous OPs and threads on DU chastising us who plainly saw Garland dragging it.
Earth-shine
Jun 2023
#61
It is a tough call at this time. Did the DOJ need to indict and extract information from the
Escurumbele
Jun 2023
#33
Looks like they had enough information to take action on those on the top including Benedict Donald
uponit7771
Jun 2023
#66
Note that investigations seemed to dead end at the money trail. I even think that Liz Cheney
Hotler
Jun 2023
#56
+1, I made this point to a friend who was asking why too many GQP still aren't calling for TFGs head
uponit7771
Jun 2023
#68
I think Garland had to be cautious because of the 40 percent of Americans who believed the 2020
LaMouffette
Jun 2023
#52
😲😲😲" there was NOT universal outrage over Trump's insurrection" . I don't agree, Americans
uponit7771
Jun 2023
#73
Most Americans were outraged, but disgustingly, there were many Republicans who approved of the
LaMouffette
Jun 2023
#77
Those are republicans while FAUX Newz is lying to them. The way to make the lies legit is to ...
uponit7771
Jun 2023
#79
The country faces no greater immediate need than holding the traitors accountable
Ponietz
Jun 2023
#53