Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Anyone calling for the replacement of Garland are playing into the hands of Trump's defenders [View all]summer_in_TX
(4,191 posts)57. The WaPo article today has a lot of heavy-weight pushback.
For instance, Emptywheel (Marcy M.T. Wheeler) points out the WaPo article relied quite a bit on Steve D'Antuono but a deeper dive would raise questions about his own role and his credibility.
The WaPo has a story that many Merrick Garland attackers claim confirms their fears about the DOJ investigation. Except the story has really important gaps, most importantly in its portrayal of the fake electors investigation, which is the damning part of the story about Garland or Lisa Monacos direct decisions (as opposed to those of FBI).
Moreover, the one thing it proves definitively is that former FBI Washington Field Office head Steve DAntuono repeatedly shot down investigative prongs of this investigation, just like he did the stolen documents investigation. That the head of the WFO was running interference for Trump raises key questions about FBI missteps with people like Brandon Straka, someone arrested early who had direct ties to the scheme in the Willard, to say nothing about WFOs ineptitude in advance of the attack.
Moreover, the one thing it proves definitively is that former FBI Washington Field Office head Steve DAntuono repeatedly shot down investigative prongs of this investigation, just like he did the stolen documents investigation. That the head of the WFO was running interference for Trump raises key questions about FBI missteps with people like Brandon Straka, someone arrested early who had direct ties to the scheme in the Willard, to say nothing about WFOs ineptitude in advance of the attack.
https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/06/19/the-wapo-shows-there-should-be-more-scrutiny-of-steve-dantuono/
On Twitter, she points out "One reason FBI (and to be clear, this story is primarily about FBI, not DOJ) was hesitant to investigate Trump is bc w/exception of NYT, no journalists have covered how John Durham criminally investigated the FBI because they investigated Trump."
"From March, on how THE POINT of the Durham investigation was to make the FBI think twice before taking steps against Trump."
From her blog:
Trophy Documents: The Entire Point Was to Make FBI Obedient
https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/03/06/trophy-documents-the-entire-point-was-to-make-fbi-obedient/
Then there's this from Allison Gill posting as Mueller, She Wrote:
"Todays Washington Post reporting contradicts Washington Post reporting from March 2022 that subpoenas for info on the leadership of the coup had been going out since Jan 2022."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/03/30/jan-6-fbi-subpoena-justice/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Anyone calling for the replacement of Garland are playing into the hands of Trump's defenders [View all]
bigtree
Jun 2023
OP
First, Biden can't fire DeJoy. Second, firing Wray would be injecting Biden into the Trump case
onenote
Jun 2023
#12
can you tell us why you think firing the man investigating his son would go down smoothly
bigtree
Jun 2023
#14
Plus 1000%. Garland knows how to prosecute and he has a good staff all around him!
marble falls
Jun 2023
#3
Today's trick question: Name a single AG in US history who has been more effective than Garland.
Beastly Boy
Jun 2023
#45
Sheer nonsense! So if we criticize Garland, we get accused of stating we want Biden to replace him?
Earth-shine
Jun 2023
#64