Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Whiny says the tape exonerates him! Not the Onion [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(183,777 posts)32. Why Trump's weird reaction to a reported audio recording matters
TFG is delusional and does not know what the term exonerate means.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-weird-reaction-reported-audio-recording-matters-rcna91337
On Monday night, as the political world began to come to terms with the story, Trump turned to his social media platform to declare that what appears to be a highly incriminating audio recording is actually an exoneration, rather than what they would have you believe.
This is one of the former presidents underappreciated tells: When he uses the word exonerated, it means hes found himself in real trouble and feels the need to try to gaslight the public. Lets revisit some our earlier coverage and take a stroll down memory lane.
In March 2018, Trump claimed that the House Intelligence Committee had completely exonerated him in the Russia scandal. That wasnt true.
In June 2018, Trump said the Justice Department inspector generals office had totally exonerated him in the Russia scandal. That was both wrong and kind of bonkers.
In February 2019, Trump claimed that the Senate Intelligence Committee had also exonerated him in the Russia scandal. That also wasnt true.
In March 2019, Trump claimed the judge in a Paul Manafort trial exonerated him, too. That also wasnt true.
In June 2021, Trump claimed hed been totally exonerated by testimony from former White House Counsel Don McGahn, which was largely the opposite of the truth.
In February 2023, Trump claimed to have total exoneration from the special grand jury in Fulton County, Georgia. This was largely not true.
And in June 2023, Trump pretended that a devastating audio recording, in which he appears to have admitted to committing crimes is actually an exoneration, as if reality has no meaning.
Either the former president doesnt know what exonerated means or hes desperately trying to deceive the public about his culpability in a variety of serious scandals.
This is one of the former presidents underappreciated tells: When he uses the word exonerated, it means hes found himself in real trouble and feels the need to try to gaslight the public. Lets revisit some our earlier coverage and take a stroll down memory lane.
In March 2018, Trump claimed that the House Intelligence Committee had completely exonerated him in the Russia scandal. That wasnt true.
In June 2018, Trump said the Justice Department inspector generals office had totally exonerated him in the Russia scandal. That was both wrong and kind of bonkers.
In February 2019, Trump claimed that the Senate Intelligence Committee had also exonerated him in the Russia scandal. That also wasnt true.
In March 2019, Trump claimed the judge in a Paul Manafort trial exonerated him, too. That also wasnt true.
In June 2021, Trump claimed hed been totally exonerated by testimony from former White House Counsel Don McGahn, which was largely the opposite of the truth.
In February 2023, Trump claimed to have total exoneration from the special grand jury in Fulton County, Georgia. This was largely not true.
And in June 2023, Trump pretended that a devastating audio recording, in which he appears to have admitted to committing crimes is actually an exoneration, as if reality has no meaning.
Either the former president doesnt know what exonerated means or hes desperately trying to deceive the public about his culpability in a variety of serious scandals.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Absolutely. Didn't at least some of his Cabinet members meet about whether to pull the "25"
allegorical oracle
Jun 2023
#15