General Discussion

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)

39. Actually they could.

Wed Jun 28, 2023, 07:55 PM

Jun 2023

The Constitution leaves the selection of EVs to the State, and says nothing about Political Parties.

You really have no rights absent those granted by the States with respect to participating in a Presidential Election.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

did this latest SC decision kill the movement to make the Electoral College obsolete? [View all] ProfessorPlum Jun 2023 OP

There was never a "movement to make the Electoral College obsolete" brooklynite Jun 2023 #1

I understand the writer to mean, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #7

But that wasn't a movement either. brooklynite Jun 2023 #9

It doesn't in itself treestar Jun 2023 #16

some states already do that, I think. Nebraska? ProfessorPlum Jun 2023 #17

Yes, and Maine treestar Jun 2023 #19

I disagree with this part In It to Win It Jun 2023 #24

Even that's not perfect. It's not proportional. In It to Win It Jun 2023 #23

They already have 205 of the 270 EC votes needed ProfessorPlum Jun 2023 #11

Its a question of WHICH States they have. brooklynite Jun 2023 #13

gee, they got the easy ones first. what a surprise ProfessorPlum Jun 2023 #15

In which case: share the current and future progress. brooklynite Jun 2023 #25

given that neither of us are Carnac the Magnificent ProfessorPlum Jun 2023 #36

I'm not speculating; I'm analyzing brooklynite Jun 2023 #38

we'll see. I think the overturning of Roe and their hateful homophobia ProfessorPlum Jun 2023 #47

Some of us hope that will eventually change, DemocraticPatriot Jun 2023 #40

I don't think Greg Abott or the Texas legislature have any intention, though Texas would benefit GregariousGroundhog Jun 2023 #21

Just had a discussion with Jocelyn Benson (MI-SOS) and Steve Simon (MN-SOS) on this topic... brooklynite Jun 2023 #34

Probably but you must wait until a Democrat wins the presidency that way so Republicans can appeal bucolic_frolic Jun 2023 #2

No, those are state laws. This ruling says state legislatures can't ignore state laws willy-nilly mathematic Jun 2023 #3

I see. thanks, that makes sense ProfessorPlum Jun 2023 #12

No, but that wasn't going to happen anyhow. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #4

Electoral votes are recalculated every 10 years with the census, no? NYC Liberal Jun 2023 #8

The total number of House seats was fixed at 435 in 1911. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #14

That statute needs to be changed Bettie Jun 2023 #20

Expanding the House solves many problems IMO Zeitghost Jun 2023 #27

Ultimately, it would make our overall political Bettie Jun 2023 #28

To Fix Congress, Make It Bigger. Much Bigger. Celerity Jun 2023 #45

Ah, ok, I see what you were referring to. NYC Liberal Jun 2023 #30

All state legislatures had to do was gab13by13 Jun 2023 #10

I took the SCOTUS decision to mean House of Roberts Jun 2023 #5

Except inthewind21 Jun 2023 #6

Which means whatever at least five of nine SCOTUS justices SAYS it means. House of Roberts Jun 2023 #33

But the federal courts can review state court decisions Ocelot II Jun 2023 #18

This is correct, as the NC Rethugs will now (after they went 5-2 RW on the NC SC and reversed the Celerity Jun 2023 #42

That could be a consequence MichMan Jun 2023 #22

Not unconstitutional but will never happen brooklynite Jun 2023 #26

Considering the Constitution Zeitghost Jun 2023 #29

A state could hardly pass laws for example that only Democrats could be awarded EC votes MichMan Jun 2023 #31

You would be shocked Zeitghost Jun 2023 #32

So a state could quit having a public vote at all, but courts won't let them require photo ID? MichMan Jun 2023 #35

For President Zeitghost Jun 2023 #37

Actually they could. brooklynite Jun 2023 #39

The Blue States should pass laws that votes for Dems count double in Presidential elections MichMan Jun 2023 #41

That doesn't double a Blue State's Electoral College vote total though. Celerity Jun 2023 #43

If the Popular Vote Compact ever got enough, it would MichMan Jun 2023 #44

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact's unlikely to happen anytime soon as it would require Celerity Jun 2023 #46