General Discussion

aggiesal

(10,821 posts)

9. The only problem with this theory is that ...

Thu Jun 29, 2023, 10:03 AM

Jun 2023

most of not all crimes were committed prior to Biden taking office and there is no way Pendejo45 or his henchmen had any idea that Biden would appoint an institutionalist like Garland as AG.

Pendejo45 is an arrogant POS and believes that there was enough co-conspirators in congress to protect a former pResident from ever paying for his crimes.

The fact is that Pendejo45 got lucky when Biden appointed Garland.
Unfortunately, Cassidy Hutchinson, elected officials and members of the DOJ held firm.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

119 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's Plan Was Working Against Merrick Garland [View all] gab13by13 Jun 2023 OP

I agree with your points. Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #1

They are untouchable by choice, not law. orthoclad Jun 2023 #16

Of course, others are going to prison for their J6 crimes. Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #19

The Covfeferacy is in a position to block all legislation orthoclad Jun 2023 #22

It appears the DOJ made a decision early on to give criminal members of congress a total pass. Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #28

Did they? Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #72

This sheshe2 Jun 2023 #100

That, or just passing a hot potato. orthoclad Jun 2023 #113

Time will tell. Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #116

Yeah. Another decade. orthoclad Jun 2023 #117

This message was self-deleted by its author Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #30

I think it is far too early to make these conclusions. If Smith ends up with RICO charges Bev54 Jun 2023 #55

Yes, time will tell us the truth. Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #78

Yeah. Just 2 1/2 years since orthoclad Jun 2023 #115

It was upsetting to me gab13by13 Jun 2023 #2

Is national TV really the best venue to address members of Congress? Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #73

I think you're giving TFG too much credit. Chakaconcarne Jun 2023 #3

Time Matters gab13by13 Jun 2023 #6

Wait, I thought Justice Matters? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #57

Yet now, over time we have the recordings from Bedminster... sheshe2 Jun 2023 #103

But they never addressed the moles orthoclad Jun 2023 #17

Agree. Trump really isn't that smart, like literally he is not smart. Caliman73 Jun 2023 #77

Trump's just another tool, orthoclad Jun 2023 #114

Biden selected a man of Supreme Court quality who appointed the nations best prosecutor Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #4

I respect your opinion, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #8

While you rely on TV lawyers for your opinions, reality marches on. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #39

Everybody who thought Garland was going at the right speed had no reason to whine. Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #74

Know what else is irrefutable? dchill Jun 2023 #13

Who tires at watching the wheels of Justice grind so finely the fascist mass? Time is not of Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #67

Justice delayed is justice denied. dchill Jun 2023 #80

That's a motto applicable to the accused...as the innocent shouldn't languish, waiting for trial! Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #83

You're wrong again. It also applies to the innocent ones who are... dchill Jun 2023 #85

Justice too fast is justice denied too treestar Jun 2023 #84

Surely you know the kind of "delayed" that I'm referencing. dchill Jun 2023 #86

"and the only way mobs are ever brought down...from the bottom up." +++++++ emulatorloo Jun 2023 #36

Bullshit. The complaint is not that it's taking too long. The fact is that not one fucking Autumn Jun 2023 #41

Openly huh inthewind21 Jun 2023 #53

If you want your rock solid it has to be investigated by the DOJ. It's not being done. Autumn Jun 2023 #64

It's not being done? inthewind21 Jun 2023 #89

Spinned by whom and in what context? Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #92

Have you heard that they are under an investigation? One sure thing is, just like Trump those Autumn Jun 2023 #105

I am not trying at all. Not even a little bit. And I don't have any plans to try harder. Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #106

Any excuse will do won't it? What make you think that they DID investigate and Autumn Jun 2023 #107

Not any excuse. Only damn good ones. Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #108

Haven't seen a damn good one from you yet. Just stretching as far as you can. Autumn Jun 2023 #110

Re-read this: Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #111

Great Sedition Trial of 1944 is a good example of political interference with justice pecosbob Jun 2023 #5

Garland wasn't AG until 2021 bucolic_frolic Jun 2023 #7

You make a good point, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #12

Smith didn't "bypass appeals to SC" Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #37

Oh come on inthewind21 Jun 2023 #54

Wait, are you suggesting Nicolle Wallace and Glen Kirchner might be wrong? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #56

I know inthewind21 Jun 2023 #79

The only problem with this theory is that ... aggiesal Jun 2023 #9

But DJT can make a pretty good prediction orthoclad Jun 2023 #15

Anyone can predict that ... aggiesal Jun 2023 #50

R's have been "lucky" for quite some time... orthoclad Jun 2023 #112

Yup n/t aggiesal Jun 2023 #119

"Sitting Congressmen appear to be untouchable." dchill Jun 2023 #10

Trump can do nothing BlueIdaho Jun 2023 #11

I have to wonder why orthoclad Jun 2023 #14

Rushing sabotages investigations Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #32

+1 emulatorloo Jun 2023 #38

Garland's choice to give the job to Smith gab13by13 Jun 2023 #40

Garland is not telling Republicans that he will not be partisan. Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #118

I mean, he was an ex-president Cosmocat Jun 2023 #42

IMO, neither Smith nor Willis are done. Eyeball_Kid Jun 2023 #18

I will agree with you when the FBI is given access to Scott Perry's phone. gab13by13 Jun 2023 #21

Do you understand that is up to the courts, not Garland? Nt Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #31

Thank you for making my point about why Time matters. gab13by13 Jun 2023 #43

Smith had no choice but to wait Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #47

what bullshit. Garland NEVER 'claimed to be an institutionalist' bigtree Jun 2023 #20

Really, do you believe that? gab13by13 Jun 2023 #25

it's a lie that he's said he's an institutionalist. Never in the way you describe him. bigtree Jun 2023 #29

What's wrong with the way I describe it? gab13by13 Jun 2023 #45

Jack Smith is a name. His title is Special Counsel. Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #23

Why did Merrick Garland agree with Bill Barr gab13by13 Jun 2023 #27

Why wouldn't he? Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #70

What a bunch of nonsense Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #24

100% agreed relayerbob Jun 2023 #52

Hail Hail The Gangs all Here gab13by13 Jun 2023 #26

You didn't think we'd sit quietly while you spread misinformation disguised as opinions? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #65

+1 chowder66 Jun 2023 #76

Didn't you invite "the gang" in when you posted? What were your expectations? Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #93

I would have thought they would be busy watching the two-and-a-half year long Law & Order episode. Scrivener7 Jun 2023 #109

I agree. Just watched yesterday, Zoe Lofgren state she was extremely disappointed boston bean Jun 2023 #33

Lofgren doesn't know anything more than you or I do Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #63

Yeah right. boston bean Jun 2023 #69

To clarify- she doesn't know more about the status of Trump's investigations Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #71

To be clear, she does. boston bean Jun 2023 #91

If true, either Lofgren is breaking the law Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #94

Bull oney boston bean Jun 2023 #95

Not exactly an evidence based refutation. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #96

Neither,is yours. boston bean Jun 2023 #97

Here is my assertion: Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #98

No boston bean Jun 2023 #101

🤷🏻‍♂️? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #102

Merrick Garland was not mandated to appoint Jack Smith, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #34

Newflash inthewind21 Jun 2023 #58

The point being Garland appointed top dog prosecutor with the instincts and knowledge of predators. Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #68

Was it the point? inthewind21 Jun 2023 #81

T*ump delegated many of his crimes. Garland delegated the prosecution. usonian Jun 2023 #35

It has always been about the timeliness of prosecution. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #44

OMG thank you. gab13by13 Jun 2023 #46

The evidence presents itself. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #48

lol inthewind21 Jun 2023 #60

The obvious evidence, obviously. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #62

How many federal prosecutions have you won? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #61

"........list of the cases against former presidents" I've won. Good question but I have an answer. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #75

Well inthewind21 Jun 2023 #87

The DOJ policy of not prosecuting sitting presidents is horrible for the US Major Nikon Jun 2023 #49

It isn't even a policy. Grasswire2 Jun 2023 #90

Have forgotten already Bear Creek Jun 2023 #51

Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith, wnylib Jun 2023 #59

The inthewind21 Jun 2023 #66

Yes, the realities don't seem to phase the whats taking so long crowd. Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #99

Trump & Plan In The Same Sentence... ProfessorGAC Jun 2023 #82

Jack Smith is a Bulldog and he does not care who he attacks RANDYWILDMAN Jun 2023 #88

This is just a silly post. Beautiful Disaster Jun 2023 #104