General Discussion

inthewind21

(4,616 posts)

89. It's not being done?

Reply to Autumn (Reply #64)

Thu Jun 29, 2023, 02:38 PM

Jun 2023

LOL. That's all I got for that one.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

119 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's Plan Was Working Against Merrick Garland [View all] gab13by13 Jun 2023 OP

I agree with your points. Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #1

They are untouchable by choice, not law. orthoclad Jun 2023 #16

Of course, others are going to prison for their J6 crimes. Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #19

The Covfeferacy is in a position to block all legislation orthoclad Jun 2023 #22

It appears the DOJ made a decision early on to give criminal members of congress a total pass. Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #28

Did they? Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #72

This sheshe2 Jun 2023 #100

That, or just passing a hot potato. orthoclad Jun 2023 #113

Time will tell. Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #116

Yeah. Another decade. orthoclad Jun 2023 #117

This message was self-deleted by its author Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #30

I think it is far too early to make these conclusions. If Smith ends up with RICO charges Bev54 Jun 2023 #55

Yes, time will tell us the truth. Irish_Dem Jun 2023 #78

Yeah. Just 2 1/2 years since orthoclad Jun 2023 #115

It was upsetting to me gab13by13 Jun 2023 #2

Is national TV really the best venue to address members of Congress? Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #73

I think you're giving TFG too much credit. Chakaconcarne Jun 2023 #3

Time Matters gab13by13 Jun 2023 #6

Wait, I thought Justice Matters? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #57

Yet now, over time we have the recordings from Bedminster... sheshe2 Jun 2023 #103

But they never addressed the moles orthoclad Jun 2023 #17

Agree. Trump really isn't that smart, like literally he is not smart. Caliman73 Jun 2023 #77

Trump's just another tool, orthoclad Jun 2023 #114

Biden selected a man of Supreme Court quality who appointed the nations best prosecutor Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #4

I respect your opinion, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #8

While you rely on TV lawyers for your opinions, reality marches on. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #39

Everybody who thought Garland was going at the right speed had no reason to whine. Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #74

Know what else is irrefutable? dchill Jun 2023 #13

Who tires at watching the wheels of Justice grind so finely the fascist mass? Time is not of Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #67

Justice delayed is justice denied. dchill Jun 2023 #80

That's a motto applicable to the accused...as the innocent shouldn't languish, waiting for trial! Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #83

You're wrong again. It also applies to the innocent ones who are... dchill Jun 2023 #85

Justice too fast is justice denied too treestar Jun 2023 #84

Surely you know the kind of "delayed" that I'm referencing. dchill Jun 2023 #86

"and the only way mobs are ever brought down...from the bottom up." +++++++ emulatorloo Jun 2023 #36

Bullshit. The complaint is not that it's taking too long. The fact is that not one fucking Autumn Jun 2023 #41

Openly huh inthewind21 Jun 2023 #53

If you want your rock solid it has to be investigated by the DOJ. It's not being done. Autumn Jun 2023 #64

It's not being done? inthewind21 Jun 2023 #89

Spinned by whom and in what context? Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #92

Have you heard that they are under an investigation? One sure thing is, just like Trump those Autumn Jun 2023 #105

I am not trying at all. Not even a little bit. And I don't have any plans to try harder. Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #106

Any excuse will do won't it? What make you think that they DID investigate and Autumn Jun 2023 #107

Not any excuse. Only damn good ones. Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #108

Haven't seen a damn good one from you yet. Just stretching as far as you can. Autumn Jun 2023 #110

Re-read this: Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #111

Great Sedition Trial of 1944 is a good example of political interference with justice pecosbob Jun 2023 #5

Garland wasn't AG until 2021 bucolic_frolic Jun 2023 #7

You make a good point, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #12

Smith didn't "bypass appeals to SC" Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #37

Oh come on inthewind21 Jun 2023 #54

Wait, are you suggesting Nicolle Wallace and Glen Kirchner might be wrong? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #56

I know inthewind21 Jun 2023 #79

The only problem with this theory is that ... aggiesal Jun 2023 #9

But DJT can make a pretty good prediction orthoclad Jun 2023 #15

Anyone can predict that ... aggiesal Jun 2023 #50

R's have been "lucky" for quite some time... orthoclad Jun 2023 #112

Yup n/t aggiesal Jun 2023 #119

"Sitting Congressmen appear to be untouchable." dchill Jun 2023 #10

Trump can do nothing BlueIdaho Jun 2023 #11

I have to wonder why orthoclad Jun 2023 #14

Rushing sabotages investigations Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #32

+1 emulatorloo Jun 2023 #38

Garland's choice to give the job to Smith gab13by13 Jun 2023 #40

Garland is not telling Republicans that he will not be partisan. Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #118

I mean, he was an ex-president Cosmocat Jun 2023 #42

IMO, neither Smith nor Willis are done. Eyeball_Kid Jun 2023 #18

I will agree with you when the FBI is given access to Scott Perry's phone. gab13by13 Jun 2023 #21

Do you understand that is up to the courts, not Garland? Nt Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #31

Thank you for making my point about why Time matters. gab13by13 Jun 2023 #43

Smith had no choice but to wait Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #47

what bullshit. Garland NEVER 'claimed to be an institutionalist' bigtree Jun 2023 #20

Really, do you believe that? gab13by13 Jun 2023 #25

it's a lie that he's said he's an institutionalist. Never in the way you describe him. bigtree Jun 2023 #29

What's wrong with the way I describe it? gab13by13 Jun 2023 #45

Jack Smith is a name. His title is Special Counsel. Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #23

Why did Merrick Garland agree with Bill Barr gab13by13 Jun 2023 #27

Why wouldn't he? Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #70

What a bunch of nonsense Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #24

100% agreed relayerbob Jun 2023 #52

Hail Hail The Gangs all Here gab13by13 Jun 2023 #26

You didn't think we'd sit quietly while you spread misinformation disguised as opinions? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #65

+1 chowder66 Jun 2023 #76

Didn't you invite "the gang" in when you posted? What were your expectations? Beastly Boy Jun 2023 #93

I would have thought they would be busy watching the two-and-a-half year long Law & Order episode. Scrivener7 Jun 2023 #109

I agree. Just watched yesterday, Zoe Lofgren state she was extremely disappointed boston bean Jun 2023 #33

Lofgren doesn't know anything more than you or I do Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #63

Yeah right. boston bean Jun 2023 #69

To clarify- she doesn't know more about the status of Trump's investigations Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #71

To be clear, she does. boston bean Jun 2023 #91

If true, either Lofgren is breaking the law Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #94

Bull oney boston bean Jun 2023 #95

Not exactly an evidence based refutation. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #96

Neither,is yours. boston bean Jun 2023 #97

Here is my assertion: Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #98

No boston bean Jun 2023 #101

🤷🏻‍♂️? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #102

Merrick Garland was not mandated to appoint Jack Smith, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #34

Newflash inthewind21 Jun 2023 #58

The point being Garland appointed top dog prosecutor with the instincts and knowledge of predators. Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #68

Was it the point? inthewind21 Jun 2023 #81

T*ump delegated many of his crimes. Garland delegated the prosecution. usonian Jun 2023 #35

It has always been about the timeliness of prosecution. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #44

OMG thank you. gab13by13 Jun 2023 #46

The evidence presents itself. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #48

lol inthewind21 Jun 2023 #60

The obvious evidence, obviously. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #62

How many federal prosecutions have you won? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #61

"........list of the cases against former presidents" I've won. Good question but I have an answer. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #75

Well inthewind21 Jun 2023 #87

The DOJ policy of not prosecuting sitting presidents is horrible for the US Major Nikon Jun 2023 #49

It isn't even a policy. Grasswire2 Jun 2023 #90

Have forgotten already Bear Creek Jun 2023 #51

Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith, wnylib Jun 2023 #59

The inthewind21 Jun 2023 #66

Yes, the realities don't seem to phase the whats taking so long crowd. Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #99

Trump & Plan In The Same Sentence... ProfessorGAC Jun 2023 #82

Jack Smith is a Bulldog and he does not care who he attacks RANDYWILDMAN Jun 2023 #88

This is just a silly post. Beautiful Disaster Jun 2023 #104