General Discussion

NanceGreggs

(27,835 posts)

14. I get what you're saying.

Sat Jul 1, 2023, 03:20 AM

Jul 2023

But it's impossible to overlook the bribery this court has blatantly demonstrated.

One wonders if the "true believers" would be persuaded to believe differently if there was enough incentive to do so.

We know they were specifically chosen because they would render the decisions they have. But doesn't that raise the question of why other 'incentives' were necessary to ensure those decisions would be forthcoming.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Name your price, SCOTUS [View all] NanceGreggs Jun 2023 OP

They'll come up with... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #1

Money is money. NanceGreggs Jun 2023 #2

They would... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #3

Seems unfair to lump in the honest 3 with the corrupt 6 by referring to them as "SCOTUS" diva77 Jun 2023 #4

Unfortunately ... NanceGreggs Jun 2023 #5

Thanks, MAGAs. We now have terrorist groups in the US. Initech Jun 2023 #6

Principles? They don't need no stinkin' principles Trailrider1951 Jun 2023 #7

Oh, I've no doubt they'd find some 'principles' ... NanceGreggs Jun 2023 #8

Let's start a Gofundme to buy a SC justice! nuxvomica Jul 2023 #9

Can't help but wonder ... NanceGreggs Jul 2023 #10

I think I was only half-joking nuxvomica Jul 2023 #11

I know you were joking. NanceGreggs Jul 2023 #12

I'm confused Zeitghost Jul 2023 #13

I get what you're saying. NanceGreggs Jul 2023 #14

I've seen lots of grifting Zeitghost Jul 2023 #15

300,000,000,000? lame54 Jul 2023 #16