Something's curious about the web designer's SCOTUS case...

[LetMyPeopleVote]

34. Procedure exists to force the Supreme Court to rehear 'made up' wedding website case: Neal Katyal

There was no case or controversy in this case. The SCOTUS should rehear this case

Link to tweet

https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-lgbtq/

Based upon new evidence that a landmark Supreme Court case on religious and 1st Amendment rights was based upon a bogus claim, former Solicitor General Neal Katyal claimed that Colorado's attorney general has a duty to ask the court to rehear the case and that a justice on the court could also ask the court to review the new information......

With that in mind, and after host Steele said everything about the case and how the conservative majority handled it "reeks," Katyal suggested there is a legitimate reason for the court to revisit their controversial ruling.

"The Supreme Court has a procedure to seek a rehearing, so to say, 'Hey Supreme Court, there's a new fact that emerged and we need you to revisit your ruling,' so that's possible," he explained. "The Supreme Court can also on its own ask for a briefing on this new question on whether this case is made up."

"Conservatives right now are defending the decision saying that Roe versus Wade, Roe wasn't pregnant at the time of the decision and that's different," he elaborated. "Roe was pregnant at the time of the filing of the complaint so she was having the exact problem that she was trying to remedy, namely seeking an abortion because she was pregnant. Here, this web designer has never once done a website for an LGBT couple. It's the exact opposite situation it's totally hypothetical and made up. I think the Colorado attorney general should consider bringing a rehearing petition before the U.S. Supreme Court."