Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Roberts thinks the criticism of his court has gone too far. [View all]DickKessler
(408 posts)36. They are the most thin-skinned snowflakes imaginable.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm in favor of a complete revamp of SCOTUS where the Justice's come randomly
cstanleytech
Jul 2023
#82
In principle, that is true. However, could one argue that the life expectancy of the time period...
xocetaceans
Jul 2023
#60
Your anecdotes are much later than the numbers which were cited in that paper.
xocetaceans
Jul 2023
#84
So...did you have any distributions to discuss? I am interested in your data re: lifespans in...
xocetaceans
Jul 2023
#86
Excellent. He's such a whiny little...(add whatever word ya want), allowing corruption all around...
brush
Jul 2023
#3
Have you notice that majority of the GQPs are whiny bullies...................
Lovie777
Jul 2023
#11
Yes! How can you not? And now we can all talk about them and express our opinions.
liberalla
Jul 2023
#20
It's not enough for them that they fuck us over with their decisions and policies.
DickKessler
Jul 2023
#40
He doesn't even consider that there really is something wrong with a court having no ethical
milestogo
Jul 2023
#65
Well, why doesn't he just cry about it. The problem is we see them for what they are.
Chainfire
Jul 2023
#12
How about if a SCOTUS ruling goes against stare decisis, it has to be at least a 75% for ruling?
brush
Jul 2023
#14
Ah, that time-honored right-wing tradition of incessant whining about criticism.
DickKessler
Jul 2023
#32
Corrupt bigots always claim they're not corrupt bigots. There's hardly anything new about that.
NNadir
Jul 2023
#47
Well if you don't like the criticism than fix it. Because the criticism is real and accurate.
usaf-vet
Jul 2023
#53
Dear John Roberts you a your merry gang of Federalism are legislating from the Bench
MagickMuffin
Jul 2023
#70
I lost all respect for John Roberts in 2010 with the Citizens United decision.
pazzyanne
Jul 2023
#75
More and more it looks like "Citizens United" was a bit of CYA on the part of the court
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Jul 2023
#76
Funny. And here's me thinking the criticism needs to ratchet up to a full-fledged ethics
PatrickforB
Jul 2023
#80