Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ExWhoDoesntCare

(4,741 posts)
78. The life expectancy numbers from olden days
Mon Jul 3, 2023, 11:19 AM
Jul 2023

Don't say what you think they do. Yes, the "average" life expectancy was low, but that's because the child mortality rate was so high, as was maternal death from childbirth.

If you could make it past 5 or 6 y/o, and if you were a woman who survived childbirth, you had a good chance of living into at least your 60s.

Really.

My great-grandparents were all born in the 1860s-1870s, and all but one of them lived to be 80+. The one who didn't make it died at 37 of an unfortunate horse riding accident, just like someone today can die young(ish) from a car accident. A gauge of how long he would have lived without the accident? Well, his three brothers lived into their 70s. His sister lived to be 98. His wife, meanwhile, made it to 106. All of his kids (four boys) lived into their 70s and beyond.

They were not unusual, because it was typical for people to live long lives, if they could survive the two biggest factors lowering average age expectancy in their day.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Suck it up, buttercup (n/t) PJMcK Jul 2023 #1
There are three co-equal branches of government COL Mustard Jul 2023 #42
I absolutely agree PJMcK Jul 2023 #58
I'm in favor of a complete revamp of SCOTUS where the Justice's come randomly cstanleytech Jul 2023 #82
That's a good idea, Mr.Bill Jul 2023 #89
In principle, that is true. However, could one argue that the life expectancy of the time period... xocetaceans Jul 2023 #60
The life expectancy numbers from olden days ExWhoDoesntCare Jul 2023 #78
Your anecdotes are much later than the numbers which were cited in that paper. xocetaceans Jul 2023 #84
So...did you have any distributions to discuss? I am interested in your data re: lifespans in... xocetaceans Jul 2023 #86
If he can't take the heat, he should get out of the kitchen sakabatou Jul 2023 #2
Excellent. He's such a whiny little...(add whatever word ya want), allowing corruption all around... brush Jul 2023 #3
Have you notice that majority of the GQPs are whiny bullies................... Lovie777 Jul 2023 #11
Yes! How can you not? And now we can all talk about them and express our opinions. liberalla Jul 2023 #20
It's not enough for them that they fuck us over with their decisions and policies. DickKessler Jul 2023 #40
They are the most thin-skinned snowflakes imaginable. DickKessler Jul 2023 #36
I don't think the criticism was harsh enough.. Deuxcents Jul 2023 #4
Umm ... speak easy Jul 2023 #49
Sounds like he is drinking some of Alitos thousand dollar whine Blues Heron Jul 2023 #5
LOL! n/t EndlessWire Jul 2023 #10
Ha! Good one. DickKessler Jul 2023 #34
Definately! Bluethroughu Jul 2023 #39
His court has gone too far and he didn't expect criticism?? Freethinker65 Jul 2023 #6
Dear (In)Justice Roberts: ananda Jul 2023 #7
He should resign from the Court since he can't handle the job Marius25 Jul 2023 #8
He doesn't even consider that there really is something wrong with a court having no ethical milestogo Jul 2023 #65
Roberts court has gone too far so fuck him and his court. Autumn Jul 2023 #9
... catbyte Jul 2023 #19
Well said. RocRizzo55 Jul 2023 #38
Well, why doesn't he just cry about it. The problem is we see them for what they are. Chainfire Jul 2023 #12
tsk, tsk, robert, it hasn't gone far enough yet. republianmushroom Jul 2023 #13
How about if a SCOTUS ruling goes against stare decisis, it has to be at least a 75% for ruling? brush Jul 2023 #14
After a couple more years of decisions Red Mountain Jul 2023 #28
History DownriverDem Jul 2023 #15
Guy interpreting Constitution EnergizedLib Jul 2023 #16
The Roberts' Court is a Kangaroo Court BlueIdaho Jul 2023 #17
WE SHOULD ALL SEND EARPLUGS TO JOHN ROBERTS. raging moderate Jul 2023 #18
Dear john, kindly perform an impossible biological feat, and STFU. niyad Jul 2023 #21
Roberts needs to first get a code of ethics in place LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #22
The beatings will continue until moral improves. nt Javaman Jul 2023 #23
He ain't seen nothin' yet. Joinfortmill Jul 2023 #24
Eliminate three words, and Roberts would be deadly accurate DFW Jul 2023 #25
Yes! *** America thinks his court has gone too far *** liberalla Jul 2023 #67
"I don't want to hear it!" 3825-87867 Jul 2023 #26
Awwwwwww, his widdle fee-fees hurt? calimary Jul 2023 #27
Poor pampered... 2naSalit Jul 2023 #29
Well, I'm not saying I want Justice Thomas to go, however... DickKessler Jul 2023 #33
I do... 2naSalit Jul 2023 #44
That works for me! DickKessler Jul 2023 #45
His power has gone to his head. He's delusional. nt leftyladyfrommo Jul 2023 #30
Sure seems like it. 2naSalit Jul 2023 #50
Ignore the court until these Paid Partisan P.O.S. resign Bluethroughu Jul 2023 #31
Ah, that time-honored right-wing tradition of incessant whining about criticism. DickKessler Jul 2023 #32
His court has gone too far. Qutzupalotl Jul 2023 #35
Shut UP, Idiot.. the Court has Cha Jul 2023 #37
Has the time come? AverageOldGuy Jul 2023 #41
Roberts' Court has gone too far to the imaginary side of the law Farmer-Rick Jul 2023 #43
Bought, sold, and paid for. YDogg Jul 2023 #46
Corrupt bigots always claim they're not corrupt bigots. There's hardly anything new about that. NNadir Jul 2023 #47
Dear Judge Roberts you can't decree people's opinion of your effort Model35mech Jul 2023 #48
My heart just bleeds for him Hekate Jul 2023 #51
They all promised to follow precedent and not legislate from the bench RANDYWILDMAN Jul 2023 #52
Well if you don't like the criticism than fix it. Because the criticism is real and accurate. usaf-vet Jul 2023 #53
His wife says she can't keep cash customers away. Kid Berwyn Jul 2023 #54
Hey Snowflake- MOMFUDSKI Jul 2023 #55
Roberts NowISeetheLight Jul 2023 #56
wait until the history books get through with you... bahboo Jul 2023 #57
Then he won't like that I call the conservatives.... usedtobedemgurl Jul 2023 #59
Roberts court is a sewer. The Unmitigated Gall Jul 2023 #61
Just getting started, fuck-o. Iggo Jul 2023 #62
Clearly what I was taught in school about civics is wrong tornado34jh Jul 2023 #63
Roberts cannot seem to get his head around the fact . . . peggysue2 Jul 2023 #64
Really? We're just getting started... Wounded Bear Jul 2023 #66
Say, he ain't one 'o them activist judges, is he? Permanut Jul 2023 #68
You ain't heard nothing yet drmeow Jul 2023 #69
Dear John Roberts you a your merry gang of Federalism are legislating from the Bench MagickMuffin Jul 2023 #70
John Roberts Taney. roamer65 Jul 2023 #71
always amazes me what offends these fuckers and what does not Skittles Jul 2023 #72
THEN STOP TAKING BRIBES, MISTER CHIEF JUSTICE! Marcuse Jul 2023 #73
He comes across as a literate sealion. Torchlight Jul 2023 #74
I lost all respect for John Roberts in 2010 with the Citizens United decision. pazzyanne Jul 2023 #75
More and more it looks like "Citizens United" was a bit of CYA on the part of the court Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2023 #76
Quit the SC Rebl2 Jul 2023 #77
White supremacists always cry NotVeryImportant Jul 2023 #79
Funny. And here's me thinking the criticism needs to ratchet up to a full-fledged ethics PatrickforB Jul 2023 #80
Someone please tell John Roberts to Go Fuck Himself Ray Bruns Jul 2023 #81
Roberts thinks the criticism of his court has gone too far? RVN VET71 Jul 2023 #83
My criticism of the SCrOTUS is just beginning... Hugin Jul 2023 #85
Ironic inthewind21 Jul 2023 #87
The arrogance....... Mad_Machine76 Jul 2023 #88
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Roberts thinks the critic...»Reply #78