Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Biden's hydrogen bombshell leaves Europe in the dust [View all]NNadir
(38,089 posts)14. Hydrogen is not clean energy. It is overwhelmingly made from fossil fuels at a significant...
...thermodynamic loss.
This is the worst energy policy of a Democratic President since Jimmy Carter's coal to gasoline syn fuels program.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She's bringing manufacturing back to this state at a pace that is truly incredible
Johnny2X2X
Jul 2023
#10
Alternatively, they can let that wilderness destroying junk rot, as it does rather quickly...
NNadir
Jul 2023
#113
please tell me they are not planning on using Michigan's Great Lakes water for this.
James48
Jul 2023
#8
Hydrogen is not clean energy. It is overwhelmingly made from fossil fuels at a significant...
NNadir
Jul 2023
#14
Because I rely on numbers, references and data I have looked them up and have them.
NNadir
Jul 2023
#142
I was asking the antinuke who said 10,000 reactors at 10 billion dollars each was "too expensive."
NNadir
Jul 2023
#86
You constantly use the cost of non-CO2 energy as a reason not to continue bulding it.
Think. Again.
Jul 2023
#88
You are, as usual, 100 per cent correct in this thread. Science matters, not some ill-informed
Celerity
Jul 2023
#123
Renewables aren't yet fully viable, especially in terms of EROI. NNadir's a scientist who has posted
Celerity
Jul 2023
#135
well, you two should have an extended colloquy, and see who has the more persuasive evidence
Celerity
Jul 2023
#137
100 trillion in wind or solar with todays technology and at scale.
DontBelieveEastisEas
Jul 2023
#127
OK. I believe the handwaving types do not now and never have cared to do any work.
NNadir
Jul 2023
#60
Oh geeze... Very, very, very, cute, one of the cutest evasions I've seen, and I've seen them all.
NNadir
Jul 2023
#80
Antinukes use ignoring gas burning as an excuse for pretending their wind and solar junk is...
NNadir
Jul 2023
#84
Has anyone done a study on the impact of hydrogen tech on a mass scale?
Fiendish Thingy
Jul 2023
#33
This article is full of bullshit. What's good for Norway may not be so good for the rest of us.
hunter
Jul 2023
#78
Aside from the production of bombs in any size we like, fusion may never be a viable energy source.
hunter
Jul 2023
#112
As I've pointed out a few times on the EE forum, hydrogen is one hell of a greenhouse gas itself
NickB79
Jul 2023
#109
So we can't figure out how to fix leaks given that it might mean the future survival of the planet??
honest.abe
Jul 2023
#110
Maybe figure out how to fix the leaks BEFORE we invest trillions in an H2 economy?
NickB79
Jul 2023
#111