Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Biden's hydrogen bombshell leaves Europe in the dust [View all]getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)70. My point is...
They never had that chance at building a strong renewable energy economy. It was crushed by the coal eco-political interests leaving only coal industry jobs.
So there only real time choices were coal or hope, and coal simply paid better better. When you are ignorant and poor, you will go with what your father had, rather than what could be.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She's bringing manufacturing back to this state at a pace that is truly incredible
Johnny2X2X
Jul 2023
#10
Alternatively, they can let that wilderness destroying junk rot, as it does rather quickly...
NNadir
Jul 2023
#113
please tell me they are not planning on using Michigan's Great Lakes water for this.
James48
Jul 2023
#8
Hydrogen is not clean energy. It is overwhelmingly made from fossil fuels at a significant...
NNadir
Jul 2023
#14
Because I rely on numbers, references and data I have looked them up and have them.
NNadir
Jul 2023
#142
I was asking the antinuke who said 10,000 reactors at 10 billion dollars each was "too expensive."
NNadir
Jul 2023
#86
You constantly use the cost of non-CO2 energy as a reason not to continue bulding it.
Think. Again.
Jul 2023
#88
You are, as usual, 100 per cent correct in this thread. Science matters, not some ill-informed
Celerity
Jul 2023
#123
Renewables aren't yet fully viable, especially in terms of EROI. NNadir's a scientist who has posted
Celerity
Jul 2023
#135
well, you two should have an extended colloquy, and see who has the more persuasive evidence
Celerity
Jul 2023
#137
100 trillion in wind or solar with todays technology and at scale.
DontBelieveEastisEas
Jul 2023
#127
OK. I believe the handwaving types do not now and never have cared to do any work.
NNadir
Jul 2023
#60
Oh geeze... Very, very, very, cute, one of the cutest evasions I've seen, and I've seen them all.
NNadir
Jul 2023
#80
Antinukes use ignoring gas burning as an excuse for pretending their wind and solar junk is...
NNadir
Jul 2023
#84
Has anyone done a study on the impact of hydrogen tech on a mass scale?
Fiendish Thingy
Jul 2023
#33
This article is full of bullshit. What's good for Norway may not be so good for the rest of us.
hunter
Jul 2023
#78
Aside from the production of bombs in any size we like, fusion may never be a viable energy source.
hunter
Jul 2023
#112
As I've pointed out a few times on the EE forum, hydrogen is one hell of a greenhouse gas itself
NickB79
Jul 2023
#109
So we can't figure out how to fix leaks given that it might mean the future survival of the planet??
honest.abe
Jul 2023
#110
Maybe figure out how to fix the leaks BEFORE we invest trillions in an H2 economy?
NickB79
Jul 2023
#111