General Discussion

getagrip_already

(17,802 posts)

76. The real question is.....

Wed Jul 5, 2023, 12:30 PM

Jul 2023

Why didn't the coal monkeys realize they could have hoovered up billions in clean energy dollars by shifting focus and diversifying?

Manchin could have made it risk free through federal subsidies and training programs. The dems would have been behind him.

Instead they fight the unions. They fight the mines. They fight the epa. They fight no market for their shifty product. They fight the public.

They will die fighting dirt and nobody will miss them one bit.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

148 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden's hydrogen bombshell leaves Europe in the dust [View all] RandySF Jul 2023 OP

You don't see many "My Governor is an Idiot" signs anymore...wonder why... MiHale Jul 2023 #1

One local person took his "My Governor is an Idiot" sign down Kaleva Jul 2023 #3

Haven't seen one of those signs in a year or so. multigraincracker Jul 2023 #11

On one of the last holdouts sign... MiHale Jul 2023 #42

It was a few weeks ago when I noticed he took his down. Kaleva Jul 2023 #53

👍👍 MiHale Jul 2023 #45

She's bringing manufacturing back to this state at a pace that is truly incredible Johnny2X2X Jul 2023 #10

A quick way to cripple our economy in favor of China's would be... Tom Rinaldo Jul 2023 #12

And like it or not Johnny2X2X Jul 2023 #20

Republicans will fight anything that would be good for Americans... Beartracks Jul 2023 #18

👍 MiHale Jul 2023 #48

Whatever, it's logical to manufacture pollution eliminating technology........ jaxexpat Jul 2023 #2

I rarely use Facebook these days, but I just posted this article. Lonestarblue Jul 2023 #4

That's a good idea PatSeg Jul 2023 #7

My sense is we'll solve the energy problem bucolic_frolic Jul 2023 #5

Hydrogen, the ultimate fuel DFW Jul 2023 #6

It is a huge thermodynamic loser, a filthy fuel. NNadir Jul 2023 #16

Yes.. Think. Again. Jul 2023 #23

What they may be going for... jmowreader Jul 2023 #108

Alternatively, they can let that wilderness destroying junk rot, as it does rather quickly... NNadir Jul 2023 #113

I'd prefer that... jmowreader Jul 2023 #121

There are a few... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #21

A minor nit: The Hindenburg was painted with rocket fuel. Hermit-The-Prog Jul 2023 #68

I recently watched a very good documentary... Hugin Jul 2023 #75

Yep. Writing orthoclad Jul 2023 #115

Hindenburg... orthoclad Jul 2023 #114

please tell me they are not planning on using Michigan's Great Lakes water for this. James48 Jul 2023 #8

All the water in the Gtest Lakes multigraincracker Jul 2023 #13

+10000 roamer65 Jul 2023 #29

How much flows into the Atlantic and how much evaporates? Kaleva Jul 2023 #56

My read on the article was that it was about manufacturing the equipment caraher Jul 2023 #69

They're building the equipment there, not orthoclad Jul 2023 #116

I have long advocated for a hydrogen economy. n/t Hugin Jul 2023 #9

Hydrogen is not clean energy. It is overwhelmingly made from fossil fuels at a significant... NNadir Jul 2023 #14

Hydrogen does NOT have to be made using fossil fuels.... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #17

Soothsaying does not substitute from reality. Hydrogen IS a dirty fuel. NNadir Jul 2023 #28

Yes... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #35

"Hydrogen is a dirty fuel"??? Trust_Reality Jul 2023 #71

They do their own research BannonsLiver Jul 2023 #73

Which part of this picture is mysterious? NNadir Jul 2023 #79

Hydrogen is only as dirty as the energy source used to make it. Think. Again. Jul 2023 #81

Yes, and it's made from dirty fossil fuels. NNadir Jul 2023 #125

No, not always... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #130

An honest person would not substitute reference to trivial... NNadir Jul 2023 #140

An honest person... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #141

Because I rely on numbers, references and data I have looked them up and have them. NNadir Jul 2023 #142

please be sure to include... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #143

Oh sure. I'll be happy to discuss how morons sabotaged... NNadir Jul 2023 #144

I agree... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #145

Many morons in my experience have no idea of what CO2 free energy is. NNadir Jul 2023 #146

Or... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #147

Post removed Post removed Jul 2023 #104

So, it should go to new nuclear plants? Kid Berwyn Jul 2023 #19

That's pretty 1950s thinking right there..... getagrip_already Jul 2023 #24

So, where do you store the spent fuel? Kid Berwyn Jul 2023 #27

Fukushima is old tech..... it's 3 mile island tech... getagrip_already Jul 2023 #55

+10 nt reACTIONary Jul 2023 #89

Here is one direction nuclear power is going... getagrip_already Jul 2023 #57

Storage of spent fuel is a.... reACTIONary Jul 2023 #91

So how Is nuclear waste safely stored? Particularly Uranium 235 & 238 electric_blue68 Jul 2023 #122

Here is a pretty detailed explination, along with... reACTIONary Jul 2023 #148

This..what Kid Berwyn said.. Tikki Jul 2023 #25

It would be wasteful to use clean nuclear plants to make hydrogen using... NNadir Jul 2023 #30

Only 10,000 plants needed? Kid Berwyn Jul 2023 #31

Fear and ignorance are powerful and frankly deadly realities. NNadir Jul 2023 #34

We really don't have much data from independent investigators, do we? Kid Berwyn Jul 2023 #44

There is no question... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #36

Hydrogen is not very portable or storable due to... reACTIONary Jul 2023 #93

That is false. Think. Again. Jul 2023 #95

Hydrogen storage and distribution is, and always has been... reACTIONary Jul 2023 #98

Here's a more recent article... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #100

Its definetly a problem that needs solving, and I'm glad that... reACTIONary Jul 2023 #103

+10 nt reACTIONary Jul 2023 #90

What's the cost of climate change? We squandered over three trillion... NNadir Jul 2023 #43

Climate Change is increasing... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #58

The question was what is the cost of climate change? NNadir Jul 2023 #77

The cost of climate change is incalculable. Think. Again. Jul 2023 #82

I was asking the antinuke who said 10,000 reactors at 10 billion dollars each was "too expensive." NNadir Jul 2023 #86

You constantly use the cost of non-CO2 energy as a reason not to continue bulding it. Think. Again. Jul 2023 #88

There is one, and only one, form of CO2 minimized energy. NNadir Jul 2023 #92

That is patently false... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #94

People lie, numbers don't. NNadir Jul 2023 #124

Imagine being this pressed over hydrogen. BannonsLiver Jul 2023 #106

You are, as usual, 100 per cent correct in this thread. Science matters, not some ill-informed Celerity Jul 2023 #123

Thanks. n/t. NNadir Jul 2023 #126

Nnadir is 100% INCORRECT... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #132

Renewables aren't yet fully viable, especially in terms of EROI. NNadir's a scientist who has posted Celerity Jul 2023 #135

Respect is earned... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #136

well, you two should have an extended colloquy, and see who has the more persuasive evidence Celerity Jul 2023 #137

No need... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #138

Indeed.. I have zero respect for "I'm not an antinuke" antinukes. NNadir Jul 2023 #139

The article you refer to... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #134

100 trillion in wind or solar with todays technology and at scale. DontBelieveEastisEas Jul 2023 #127

No, it doesn't "seem" so. NNadir Jul 2023 #128

Thanks for the acknowledgement and feedback /nt DontBelieveEastisEas Jul 2023 #129

No, Solar and wind are NOT dependent on fossil fuels... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #133

That's a little misleading. Happy Hoosier Jul 2023 #22

Is this a simple matter, replacing all the production of electricity... NNadir Jul 2023 #32

No... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #38

I notice you don';t propose a solution. Happy Hoosier Jul 2023 #39

My extensive journal on this website, referencing tens of thousands of... NNadir Jul 2023 #47

Point to one. Happy Hoosier Jul 2023 #50

How about you click on my name to open it. NNadir Jul 2023 #54

Yeah, I thought so... Happy Hoosier Jul 2023 #59

OK. I believe the handwaving types do not now and never have cared to do any work. NNadir Jul 2023 #60

You use gaslighting as a debate technique. Think. Again. Jul 2023 #63

This is similar to the charge registered by an earlier... NNadir Jul 2023 #67

OFFS. Happy Hoosier Jul 2023 #65

Oh geeze... Very, very, very, cute, one of the cutest evasions I've seen, and I've seen them all. NNadir Jul 2023 #80

You use gaslighting as a debate method. Think. Again. Jul 2023 #83

Antinukes use ignoring gas burning as an excuse for pretending their wind and solar junk is... NNadir Jul 2023 #84

I have a Masters in Engineering as well. Happy Hoosier Jul 2023 #97

He is indeed incredibly rude, dismissive and insulting. honest.abe Jul 2023 #105

I suggest... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #49

Yeah, that's great. That hasn't worked. What's next? Happy Hoosier Jul 2023 #51

I absolutely agree with you... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #61

Hear! Hear! Happy Hoosier Jul 2023 #62

One obvious and straight forward direction is .... reACTIONary Jul 2023 #96

For many applications, where using electric power directly isn't practical... Silent3 Jul 2023 #52

I still have hope for Hydrogen fuel cell cars. Happy Hoosier Jul 2023 #66

I don't. hunter Jul 2023 #101

So does China - in a BIG way Caribbeans Jul 2023 #102

I'll never understand... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #15

Because the only way they were going to get a good paycheck getagrip_already Jul 2023 #26

No... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #40

My point is... getagrip_already Jul 2023 #70

That's what I was trying to say... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #74

The real question is..... getagrip_already Jul 2023 #76

I think Manchin had/has his own financial interests. Trust_Reality Jul 2023 #72

We should have installed renewable manufaturing plants orthoclad Jul 2023 #117

Has anyone done a study on the impact of hydrogen tech on a mass scale? Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #33

When converted to electricity... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #41

+10, water in, water out. NT reACTIONary Jul 2023 #99

This message was self-deleted by its author orthoclad Jul 2023 #119

The byproduct of hydrogen is water and heat. Kaleva Jul 2023 #64

Industrial hydrogen use orthoclad Jul 2023 #118

Great news ... and great news to add hydrogen to the energy mix. Auggie Jul 2023 #37

At least the idiocy of windmill cancer clusters has ended. Torchlight Jul 2023 #46

This article is full of bullshit. What's good for Norway may not be so good for the rest of us. hunter Jul 2023 #78

You're correct.... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #85

Hope all goes well! on so many levels! TY Cha Jul 2023 #87

yeah I have to agree this is a bad idea for Michigan Takket Jul 2023 #107

Aside from the production of bombs in any size we like, fusion may never be a viable energy source. hunter Jul 2023 #112

As I've pointed out a few times on the EE forum, hydrogen is one hell of a greenhouse gas itself NickB79 Jul 2023 #109

So we can't figure out how to fix leaks given that it might mean the future survival of the planet?? honest.abe Jul 2023 #110

Maybe figure out how to fix the leaks BEFORE we invest trillions in an H2 economy? NickB79 Jul 2023 #111

Leak containment has come a long way... Think. Again. Jul 2023 #131

We should think of hydrogen as storage for energy orthoclad Jul 2023 #120