General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Biden's hydrogen bombshell leaves Europe in the dust [View all]Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)Nnadir manipulates research in attempts to justify their position that we not use any other form of non-CO2 energy generation other than nuclear.
This is an impossible proposition, we must also have portable forms of energy in addition to electricity to displace liquid and gaseous fossil fuels.
Nuclear can be a very valuable PART of our new energy economy, but we also have other technology that will serve specific purposes in safer, more economical, and more targeted and practical ways. Even fossil fuel energy is not a one-size-fits-all solution.
Nnadir's posts are written specifically to delay and discourage the implementation of the technology we will need to displace the burning of fossil fuels. This would lead to continued emissions of CO2 and that would result in continued deaths and the continued destruction of the ecosystems we rely on for our health and well-being.
I also have a post-graduate science education and I have a responsibility to correct falsehoods on important matters.
I am also a member of our shared society and I will not tolerate the personal abuse, psychological manipulation, and deceit that Nnadir employs to cover their deliberate misinformation.
Thank you for the civil and caring response, but I take the climate crisis that we're in very seriously, I realize how important public engagement is to the success of the energy transition we must make, and I see no point in witholding corrections to Nnadir's intentional and dishonest attempts to build negative public opinion about non-CO2 energy sources.