Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mojowork_n

(2,354 posts)
13. The SOB's who cheered Newt Gingrich answering Juan Williams....
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 04:20 PM
Jan 2012

...are despicable. But to be fair, it's been 30 years since the Other
Side started using "Perception Management" (also called
"Public Diplomacy" during the St. Ronnie mis-administration) to
mold the opinions -- and fear and prejudice -- of "low information
voters." (As Thom Hartmann calls them.)

Only a few more hours to take a look, but the wiki page is
very revealing, and has a lot of good information:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perception_management

There are nine strategies for perception management. These include:

1. Preparation — Having clear goals and knowing the ideal position you want people to hold.
2. Credibility — Make sure all of your information is consistent, often using prejudices or expectations to increase credibility.
3. Multichannel support — Have multiple arguments and fabricated facts to reinforce your information.
4. Centralized control — Employing entities such as propaganda ministries or bureaus.
5. Security — The nature of the deception campaign is known by few.
6. Flexibility — The deception campaign adapts and changes over time as needs change.
7. Coordination — The organization or propaganda ministry is organized in a hierarchical pattern in order to maintain consistent and synchronized distribution of information.
8. Concealment — Contradicting information is destroyed.
9. Untruthful statements — Fabricate the truth.


Does anyone really have any idea how organized and dedicated and well-funded that effort's been?

Can we make any sort of informed estimate, based on the apparent results? As seen in places like
the Republican Debates?
I thought maybe the entire Walker Administration. Jackpine Radical Jan 2012 #1
K&R, but to be fair BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #2
Only most of them. Chan790 Jan 2012 #6
Okay BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #7
I never heard of the latter Ter Jan 2012 #14
Sorry to be correcting you, but everybody hates Westboro Baptist WhoIsNumberNone Jan 2012 #21
i haven't watched a single one of the debates, barbtries Jan 2012 #3
I read the live blogs of the debates. The snark and real time fact checking is more alfredo Jan 2012 #4
My hope is future generations will be able to understand what emerged in 21 st century America. gordianot Jan 2012 #5
No kidding duhneece Jan 2012 #8
I'd give a nod to that "Focus on the Family" group in Colorado for most vile group. nt TBF Jan 2012 #9
No. cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #10
That's an insult to people with mental illness. (nt) redqueen Jan 2012 #11
Nope. Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #12
The SOB's who cheered Newt Gingrich answering Juan Williams.... mojowork_n Jan 2012 #13
Good info to have for posters on this site! Kaleko Jan 2012 #16
There are so many more PR people (and PR dollars) than mojowork_n Jan 2012 #19
Damn, that is a brilliant description. Kaleko Jan 2012 #23
I don't agree (nt) bigwillq Jan 2012 #15
I feel bad for Juan Williams. Rozlee Jan 2012 #17
I don't want to live in the same country as the republican base RainDog Jan 2012 #18
Boy oh boy! You have that right! lunatica Jan 2012 #20
Glenn Greenwald and Ron Paul.. Fumesucker Jan 2012 #22
A fine example of perception management Kaleko Jan 2012 #25
Sadists at a gladiatorial battle of pseudo-intellectuals. n/t MarkCharles Jan 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll: The single most vi...»Reply #13