Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pototan

(3,048 posts)
31. If you follow the thread...
Tue Jul 18, 2023, 09:51 PM
Jul 2023

...I got a different opinion from other lawyers. You don't mind if I get a second opinion, do you?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I gave the bank teller a note saying hand over all your cash, I didn't intend to doc03 Jul 2023 #1
If he knew he had lost, it's a different kind of crime. Fraud, for one thing. enough Jul 2023 #2
of course he knows he lost Skittles Jul 2023 #13
'willfully subjects any person in any State,' meaning WITH KNOWLEDGE. elleng Jul 2023 #3
My point is... Pototan Jul 2023 #6
Behavior often demonstrates knowledge, and I suspect 'instructions' state such; elleng Jul 2023 #8
Don't forget the two expensive studies he paid for showing no fraud. Nevilledog Jul 2023 #19
+1 spooky3 Jul 2023 #20
You would be wrong... brooklynite Jul 2023 #35
No. You can't just instruct the jury as to what a reasonable person would have believed. Ms. Toad Jul 2023 #9
No judge says "find him guilty"... Pototan Jul 2023 #15
The mens rea of the crime is ALWAYS subjective - what the accused actually knew. Ms. Toad Jul 2023 #18
Attempting to nfluence official proceeedings... Happy Hoosier Jul 2023 #44
Criminal offenses have elements which constitute the crime. rsdsharp Jul 2023 #4
The 62 cases are not really a good argument. former9thward Jul 2023 #5
Once you have exhausted all your legal avenues... Pototan Jul 2023 #11
Not true, according to Reuters. spooky3 Jul 2023 #14
What cases had a trial giving the evidence? former9thward Jul 2023 #21
Read the article and the one to which it links. Go to Marc Elias' site spooky3 Jul 2023 #22
I read the article. former9thward Jul 2023 #23
Did you read the linked WaPo article? Maybe you should spooky3 Jul 2023 #24
I am posting just like you. former9thward Jul 2023 #27
That's not true for all 62 cases. Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #28
Crimes generally include two kinds of elements Ms. Toad Jul 2023 #7
So, no election is ever over in America... Pototan Jul 2023 #12
So you weren't really looking for legal information? Ms. Toad Jul 2023 #16
Hey... MorbidButterflyTat Jul 2023 #29
I didn't say I disagree. I'm just asking... Pototan Jul 2023 #30
claim what they say. Ms. Toad Jul 2023 #34
If you follow the thread... Pototan Jul 2023 #31
... Faux pas Jul 2023 #10
This may help LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #17
Inaccurate because the analogy is not appropriate. Ms. Toad Jul 2023 #25
His mental state was to deprive a Biden presidency. boston bean Jul 2023 #38
That is still consistent with a belief that he won. Ms. Toad Jul 2023 #39
It's clear he knew he lost. He was told. Ignoring a truth doesn't mean one boston bean Jul 2023 #40
If it is clear that he knew he lost, Ms. Toad Jul 2023 #41
They charged him. They feel they can prove it. boston bean Jul 2023 #42
So? Ms. Toad Jul 2023 #43
They have to show the liar is is liar. boston bean Jul 2023 #45
Not quite. Ms. Toad Jul 2023 #46
He lies that is evident. It will be all the evidence of is his lies that will make it easy to prove boston bean Jul 2023 #47
It doesn't need to be proven that he believed he lost Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #26
Proving he believed he lost is merely supplement evidence... brooklynite Jul 2023 #37
I don't think that EndlessWire Jul 2023 #32
Go ahead and up willful ignorance or blindness too; there are other terms for it. Hortensis Jul 2023 #33
Not a lawyer but malaise Jul 2023 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can a DU legal expert exp...»Reply #31