Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Sky Jewels

(9,148 posts)
55. Exactly. He went after the low-hanging fruit,
Wed Aug 2, 2023, 11:34 AM
Aug 2023

the little people, but sat on his hands when it came to Trump.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm angry. He should have acted with much more urgency, IMO. Sky Jewels Aug 2023 #1
bahahaha--this time table is perfect Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #2
It does, but he didn't start on the process right away. Sky Jewels Aug 2023 #3
He certainly did! Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #14
Mahalo for these FACTS about AG Garland, Cha Aug 2023 #19
I am just tired of spoon feeding the facts over and over again, despite them being freely available Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #24
No worries.. I cheered up when Cha Aug 2023 #25
. Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #26
Fact: He did not go after Trump Sky Jewels Aug 2023 #56
that is typically how these cases work Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #66
Mahalo, RG! Cha Aug 2023 #74
Time was of the essence. He could have pursued the big guys and the little guys Sky Jewels Aug 2023 #75
I disagree that he needed to go after Trump right away Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #76
"Highly partisan"?! Sky Jewels Aug 2023 #78
no--just that I won't look to him for reasoned approach to this legal issue Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #79
"Garland had to be pressured appointing Jack Smith!" MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #81
Well, Garland did not have your superior wnylib Aug 2023 #89
Nice! Joinfortmill Aug 2023 #21
Thank you for sharing your work - again! pazzyanne Aug 2023 #35
hahaha! great info Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #37
He did not need to get all of the small guys first. Sky Jewels Aug 2023 #63
Considering what you know vs what The AG Garland knows Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #64
You speak with such authority and certainty wnylib Aug 2023 #90
He was going after the small potatoes. Sky Jewels Aug 2023 #54
I think timing is important but not in the way you are believing Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #65
+1000 Duppers Aug 2023 #41
You're right.. "Perfect Timing"!! Cha Aug 2023 #7
It will not be 'perfect timing' if the trial gets spun out past the election and Trump wins Celerity Aug 2023 #15
i was watching that too orleans Aug 2023 #39
here is the video Celerity Aug 2023 #94
thank you for this orleans Aug 2023 #95
WHAT? MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #80
Bravo inthewind21 Aug 2023 #84
egggxzactly. pundits don't get paid to say Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #85
Yeah, no one is perfect.. not even Prof Tribe. Cha Aug 2023 #93
you make incorrect positings and walk past the main point Celerity Aug 2023 #91
Too bad.. AG Garland Got the Job done with Cha Aug 2023 #6
And thats the key jcgoldie Aug 2023 #8
+ 1 nt pazzyanne Aug 2023 #36
Yep canetoad Aug 2023 #40
Right there MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #82
Thank you, MorbidButterfly.. Cha Aug 2023 #83
Well said! lees1975 Aug 2023 #28
there are undoubtedly a lot of reasons they waited to do so Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #38
Let the leaders do their jobs? lees1975 Aug 2023 #77
if it makes you feel better that this lifetime professional had to be Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #87
I know more than professionals! I am counting and stamping my feet we can do it Aug 2023 #73
I never doubted AG Garland Cha Aug 2023 #4
yay!!! I am kind of in a haze about today's Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #5
Yeah, I'm in a haze of happiness, too.. Cha Aug 2023 #9
I am grateful. summer_in_TX Aug 2023 #10
I bet you we will be able to keep him from office even if Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #11
Thank you, Jack Smith Silent3 Aug 2023 #12
it is thoughts like this that made me post what I did Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #13
He eventually gets around to getting results... Silent3 Aug 2023 #16
This is ridiculous. Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #22
Where's your evidence? Silent3 Aug 2023 #30
My evidence for what? That you have no evidence? Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #42
800 indictments not-of-Trump is not evidence of any sort... Silent3 Aug 2023 #44
800 indictments of not Trump is certainly evidence, unless you are stubbornly determined Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #45
The indictments filed today were not all all built on the street-rabble indictments n/t Silent3 Aug 2023 #46
Who said they were? Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #47
My complaint about Garland and the DoJ is that they weren't working hard enough... Silent3 Aug 2023 #48
So you have complaints, not facts. That's rich. Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #49
It is not truth of anything regarding work done to go after the big fish Silent3 Aug 2023 #50
Ok, let me quote you. Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #51
Geez, even right there in what you quoted back from me... Silent3 Aug 2023 #52
So, in your awkwardly constructed sentence, you DO, ever so evasively, give DOJ credit Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #53
I'm not here to praise the DoJ for simply doing their job, but if it makes you feel better... Silent3 Aug 2023 #58
You really seem upset that people are happy Trump was indicted AZSkiffyGeek Aug 2023 #60
I'm happy Trump has been indicted Silent3 Aug 2023 #69
Interesting you skipped right past the whole "trial" part of our toothless justice system AZSkiffyGeek Aug 2023 #71
What makes me feel better is Garlands exemplary and undeniable accomplishments as AG Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #68
You have no facts to back your position either. Silent3 Aug 2023 #70
Oh please! I gave you a shitload of facts, complete with links! Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #72
Hmmm... Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #92
Exactly. He went after the low-hanging fruit, Sky Jewels Aug 2023 #55
Thank you, Silent3 Sky Jewels Aug 2023 #57
actually, quite the opposite Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #67
This is a thank you Garland thread. Not a meh Garland thread. Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #17
I'll comment as I like, where I like n/t Silent3 Aug 2023 #18
And I will demonstrate how poor your choices are, wherever and whenever you choose to comment. Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #23
Post removed Post removed Aug 2023 #29
In a thank you Garland thread it certainly is. Beastly Boy Aug 2023 #43
thank you for keeping this Garland appreciation thread kicked Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #31
If having this sycophantic thread kicked thrills you so much... Silent3 Aug 2023 #32
this is the appropriate type of content on Democratic site Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #34
For something you don't care about it you're certainly posting a lot AZSkiffyGeek Aug 2023 #59
I didn't say I don't care about the SUBJECT of the thread Silent3 Aug 2023 #62
Ok, real good, then. MineralMan Aug 2023 #61
Me either. Always felt Joe & Merrick had a meeting of the minds Joinfortmill Aug 2023 #20
Don't you know that Mitch McConnell is kicking himself right now... lees1975 Aug 2023 #27
lets put it this way Recycle_Guru Aug 2023 #33
That's it, right there. MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #86
I thank AG Garland, too. MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #88
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thank you, Merrick Garlan...»Reply #55