Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Prairie_Seagull

(4,697 posts)

22. I posted this in LBN, in a thread that OS locked.

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sat Aug 5, 2023, 12:04 PM

Aug 2023

This mfer has never been shy about calling people out by name or organization in the past.

That he meant the comment toward some theoretical political adversary is absolute bullshit.

Lock him up, gag him or sternly warn him so it makes the front page of the times. Something FFS.

(slightly edited)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump trying to walk back his threat - No one is going to buy his BS [View all] kpete Aug 2023 OP

Then perhaps he should be a bit more specific about the target when he issues threats Siwsan Aug 2023 #1

Now that is funny. Stuffing tooth paste back in the tube. Really bad timing is a Trump trademark. gordianot Aug 2023 #2

That's the thing with him though. No one has to Scrivener7 Aug 2023 #3

Sad but dangerously TRUE riversedge Aug 2023 #16

Typical threat behavior of a Sociopath Otto_Harper Aug 2023 #4

Trump's not walking back his threat.. agingdem Aug 2023 #5

All of us! claudette Aug 2023 #7

Political speech claudette Aug 2023 #6

Because the ambiguous in law offending post didn't trigger a jail request by the Motion? Alexander Of Assyria Aug 2023 #11

Well claudette Aug 2023 #23

Judge can't order what isn't being asked, it's fairly simple...now just asking for written Alexander Of Assyria Aug 2023 #24

I'm not sure claudette Aug 2023 #27

No it wasn't. It was to Smith and the witnesses against him. marble falls Aug 2023 #8

and those witnesses he would consider as "RINOS" JohnSJ Aug 2023 #9

Exactimundo! marble falls Aug 2023 #10

Could this be a 'walk it back or else'? nt Prairie_Seagull Aug 2023 #12

The definition of political speech ? dweller Aug 2023 #13

Trump always makes things worse for Trump. GoCubsGo Aug 2023 #14

Keep digging asshole. BlueIdaho Aug 2023 #15

lol!! newdayneeded Aug 2023 #17

He's just testing the line... kentuck Aug 2023 #18

I agree... Happy Hoosier Aug 2023 #20

It's a childish dare. nt Prairie_Seagull Aug 2023 #21

He can explain it in person to the judge and the judge can decide. Takket Aug 2023 #19

I posted this in LBN, in a thread that OS locked. Prairie_Seagull Aug 2023 #22

Nice Try ProfessorGAC Aug 2023 #25

Prosecutors ask judge to issue protective order after Trump post appearing to promise revenge LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #26