Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Nevilledog

(55,140 posts)
Sat Aug 5, 2023, 12:17 PM Aug 2023

EPA Approved a Fuel Ingredient Even Though It Could Cause Cancer in Virtually Every Person Exposed.. [View all]

https://www.propublica.org/article/epa-approved-chevron-fuel-ingredient-cancer-risk-plastics-biofuel

The Environmental Protection Agency approved a component of boat fuel made from discarded plastic that the agency’s own risk formula determined was so hazardous, everyone exposed to the substance continually over a lifetime would be expected to develop cancer. Current and former EPA scientists said that threat level is unheard of. It is a million times higher than what the agency usually considers acceptable for new chemicals and six times worse than the risk of lung cancer from a lifetime of smoking.

Federal law requires the EPA to conduct safety reviews before allowing new chemical products onto the market. If the agency finds that a substance causes unreasonable risk to health or the environment, the EPA is not allowed to approve it without first finding ways to reduce that risk.

But the agency did not do that in this case. Instead, the EPA decided its scientists were overstating the risks and gave Chevron the go-ahead to make the new boat fuel ingredient at its refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi. Though the substance can poison air and contaminate water, EPA officials mandated no remedies other than requiring workers to wear gloves, records show.

ProPublica and the Guardian in February reported on the risks of other new plastic-based Chevron fuels that were also approved under an EPA program that the agency had touted as a “climate-friendly” way to boost alternatives to petroleum-based fuels. That story was based on an EPA consent order, a legally binding document the agency issues to address risks to health or the environment. In the Chevron consent order, the highest noted risk came from a jet fuel that was expected to create air pollution so toxic that 1 out of 4 people exposed to it over a lifetime could get cancer.

*snip*


28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Everyone wins Tetrachloride Aug 2023 #1
Here's the key sentence that shows somebody made a bunch of $$ for the approval of this BComplex Aug 2023 #2
Harvard environmental law professor resigns from ConocoPhillips cbabe Aug 2023 #3
I Find It Odd That... ProfessorGAC Aug 2023 #4
That is explained in the risk assessment hyper-linked in the OP HeartachesNhangovers Aug 2023 #5
That Isn't Enough ProfessorGAC Aug 2023 #9
Just trying to help. If you want a technical answer to a technical question, HeartachesNhangovers Aug 2023 #12
I Know You Haven't Been Here Long ProfessorGAC Aug 2023 #14
"Don't you know who I am?" ZoltarSpeaks Aug 2023 #25
I'm just looking for a name waddirum Aug 2023 #6
I Can't Find It! ProfessorGAC Aug 2023 #7
Thanks for your hard work ProfessorGAC. nt Prairie_Seagull Aug 2023 #26
It could be these chemicals are already common pollutants... hunter Aug 2023 #13
I See Your Point ProfessorGAC Aug 2023 #15
I agree with you. hunter Aug 2023 #19
Graceful? ProfessorGAC Aug 2023 #20
EPA and NHTSA are dirty corporate whores. WarGamer Aug 2023 #8
What year was this? Who appointed the EPA head at the time? This is appalling. Hekate Aug 2023 #10
" EPA decided its scientists were overstating the risks" Takket Aug 2023 #11
My Question Above! ProfessorGAC Aug 2023 #21
Did you see this? scipan Aug 2023 #22
That Tells Me One Thing ProfessorGAC Aug 2023 #24
Thank you for your expertise in this. scipan Aug 2023 #28
So When NowISeetheLight Aug 2023 #16
No names or identifying info dalton99a Aug 2023 #17
Not THE ONION or Borowitz? Brainfodder Aug 2023 #18
What good is the EPA if they whitewash ... Duppers Aug 2023 #23
Read the linked story if you haven't. Mislabeling emmisions? The EPA. Give me a break. Prairie_Seagull Aug 2023 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EPA Approved a Fuel Ingre...