Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Trump's lawyers are now ordered to appear before the court by 5 PM on Monday [View all]Goonch
(3,885 posts)13. Fox News: "Now we're hearing....."?

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Trump's lawyers are now ordered to appear before the court by 5 PM on Monday [View all]
Botany
Aug 2023
OP
AP: Chutkan on Saturday gave Trump's legal team until 5 p.m. Monday to respond
dalton99a
Aug 2023
#12
Trump was ordered not to speak/tweet like he just did on Thursday afternoon and by Friday PM he was
Botany
Aug 2023
#15
Yes! In the legal jungle why do folks try to navigate without a guide??! For sure this the path!....??
Alexander Of Assyria
Aug 2023
#16
See above posts. This is not a motion to sanction TFG or to change the conditions of his release.
Ocelot II
Aug 2023
#20
As the screenshot in #11 says, they have to produce a "revised version" of the protective order
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2023
#25
Don't minimize it, he's being called to the Principal's office for something he did. n/t
aggiesal
Aug 2023
#26
His lawyer represent him. He did something and now the Principal is calling. Don't minimize it. n/t
aggiesal
Aug 2023
#33
No. He is not being called on the carpet. He will not be anywhere near "the carpet." His lawyers
3Hotdogs
Aug 2023
#88
Man, are you swimming upstream against a strong current of "I can't hear you", or what?
jaxexpat
Aug 2023
#70
But the motion for protective order included tweets Trump made on 4 August
Farmer-Rick
Aug 2023
#101
He's not being called to testify for a routine discovery motion, and he has the same
Ocelot II
Aug 2023
#31
He has a constitutional right not to testify, and that's the only answer he needs to give.
Ocelot II
Aug 2023
#47
If he wants to testify, his lawyers cannot do anything to stop him, it is his right and the Judge
Bev54
Aug 2023
#57
Are his lawyers smart enough to request a recusal? I hope he insists on testifying
Bev54
Aug 2023
#74
It's a withdrawal, not a recusal, but before seeking the court's permission to withdraw
Ocelot II
Aug 2023
#77
Now that would be fun, I do hope either way they do get cameras in the courtroom.
Bev54
Aug 2023
#78
I think this judge would recognize it as a delaying tactic and put a stop to it
Ocelot II
Aug 2023
#103
I generally look for your posts in these matters. I also appreciate your patience
likesmountains 52
Aug 2023
#64
TFG's attorneys just filed a motion asking for three more days to respond to protective order
LetMyPeopleVote
Aug 2023
#46
It's a necessary step before she calls him in. Giving them "the talk" about discipling their client.
ancianita
Aug 2023
#51
Yeah, we ordinary people would be in jail right now, as we speak. They are sure
PatrickforB
Aug 2023
#58
TFG was told by the magistrate in Judge Chutkan's court not to do or say certian things @ 4:00 ....
Botany
Aug 2023
#68
No, it hasn't. This is just TFG's motion *asking* the deadline to be moved to 8/10.
Ocelot II
Aug 2023
#82
Yes, I did read it. I'd swear it had, at the end, that it was granted. My error but
Wonder Why
Aug 2023
#92
The minute orders are almost impossible to read off Xitter, really easy to misread.
Ocelot II
Aug 2023
#94
Jack Smith has filed a motion asking the Judge to reject the proposed three day delay
LetMyPeopleVote
Aug 2023
#83